Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30271080›Full record

ReviewWorld journal of gastroenterology2018

Ten years of sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma: Are there any predictive and/or prognostic markers?

Giorgia Marisi, Alessandro Cucchetti, Paola Ulivi, Matteo Canale, Giuseppe Cabibbo, Leonardo Solaini, Francesco G Foschi, Serena De Matteis, Giorgio Ercolani, Martina Valgiusti and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in World journal of gastroenterology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 101 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
101citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

101 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

41 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Giorgia MarisiBiosciences Laboratory, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola 47014, Italy.
Alessandro CucchettiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna 40126, Italy.
Paola UliviBiosciences Laboratory, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola 47014, Italy.
Matteo CanaleBiosciences Laboratory, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola 47014, Italy.
Giuseppe CabibboSection of Gastroenterology, DI.BI.M.I.S., University of Palermo, Palermo 35628, Italy.
Leonardo SolainiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna 40126, Italy.
Francesco G FoschiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Degli Infermi Hospital, Faenza 48018, Italy.
Serena De MatteisBiosciences Laboratory, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola 47014, Italy.
Giorgio ErcolaniDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna 40126, Italy.
Martina ValgiustiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori IRCCS, Meldola 47014, Italy.
Giovanni L FrassinetiDepartment of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori IRCCS, Meldola 47014, Italy.
Mario ScartozziDepartment of Medical Oncology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari 45698, Italy.
Andrea Casadei GardiniDepartment of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori IRCCS, Meldola 47014, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sorafenib has been considered the standard of care for patients with advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) since 2007 and numerous studies have investigated the role of markers involved in the angiogenesis process at both the expression and genetic level and clinical aspect. What results have ten years of research produced? Several clinical and biological markers are associated with prognosis. The most interesting clinical parameters are adverse events, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage, and macroscopic vascular invasion, while several single nucleotide polymorphisms and plasma angiopoietin-2 levels represent the most promising biological biomarkers. A recent pooled analysis of two phase III randomized trials showed that the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, etiology and extra-hepatic spread are predictive factors of response to sorafenib, but did not identify any predictive biological markers. After 10 years of research into sorafenib there are still no validated prognostic or predictive factors of response to the drug in HCC. The aim of the present review was to summarize 10 years of research into sorafenib, looking in particular at the potential of associated clinical and biological markers to predict its efficacy in patients with advanced HCC.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, HepatocellularClinical Trials, Phase III as TopicDrug Resistance, NeoplasmHumansLeukocyte CountLiverLiver NeoplasmsNeoplasm InvasivenessPrognosisSorafenibTreatment OutcomeAntineoplastic AgentsBiomarkers, TumorSorafenibAdverse eventsAngiopoietinBiomarkerHepatocellular carcinomaMicroRNANeutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratioPolymorphismsSorafenibVascular endothelial growth factor

Identifiers

PMID30271080
PMCPMC6158485

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.