Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30270812›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2018

Impact of community-based adherence support on treatment outcomes for tuberculosis, leprosy and HIV/AIDS-infected individuals in post-Ebola Liberia.

Julia H Rogers, Lassana Jabateh, Jason Beste, Bradley H Wagenaar, Ryan McBain, Daniel Palazuelos, Eugene Wickett, Catherine Oswald, Harriet G Napier, Julia Toomey-Garbo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Social Protection Interventions for TB-Affected Households: A Scoping Review.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2023
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Julia H Rogersa Partners In Health Liberia , Monrovia.
Lassana Jabateha Partners In Health Liberia , Monrovia.
Jason Bestea Partners In Health Liberia , Monrovia.
Bradley H Wagenaara Partners In Health Liberia , Monrovia.ORCID 0000-0002-3351-7175
Ryan McBaina Partners In Health Liberia , Monrovia.
Daniel Palazuelosa Partners In Health Liberia , Monrovia.
Eugene Wicketta Partners In Health Liberia , Monrovia.ORCID 0000-0002-9223-532X
Catherine Oswalda Partners In Health Liberia , Monrovia.
Harriet G Napiera Partners In Health Liberia , Monrovia.
Julia Toomey-Garbog Liberian Ministry of Health , Monrovia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPartners In Health (PIH) committed to improving health care delivery in Maryland County, Liberia following the Ebola epidemic by employing 71 community health workers (CHWs) to provide treatment support to tuberculosis (TB), HIV and leprosy patients. PIH simultaneously deployed a socioeconomic assistance program with three core components: transportation reimbursement to clinics; food support; and additional social assistance in select cases.

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate how a CHW program for community treatment support and addressing socioeconomic barriers to care can impact patient outcomes in a post-conflict and post-epidemic context.

methodsRetrospective observational study utilizing registry data from 513 TB, 447 HIV and 75 leprosy patients at three health facilities in Maryland County, Liberia. Treatment coverage and clinical outcomes for patient cohorts enrolled in the pre-intervention period (January 2015 to June 2015) and the post-intervention period (July 2015 to July 2017) are compared using logistic regression analyses.

resultsTB treatment coverage increased from 7.7% pre-intervention to 43.2% (p < 0.001) post-intervention and lost to follow-up (LTFU) rates decreased from 9.5% to 2.1% (p = 0.003). ART treatment coverage increased 3.8 percentage points (p = 0.03), with patient retention improving 63.9% to 86.1% (p < 0.001); a 6.0 percentage point decrease in HIV LTFU was also observed (p = 0.21). Despite an 84.3% treatment success rate observed for leprosy patients, pre-intervention data was largely unavailable and statistical significance could not be reached for any treatment outcomes pre-post intervention.

conclusionsThe PIH approach to CHW community treatment support in Liberia demonstrates how, with the right inputs, excellent clinical outcomes are possible even in post-conflict and post-epidemic contexts. Care should be taken to position and support CHWs so that they have the opportunity to succeed, including full integration and recognition within the system, and the addition of clinical system improvements and social supports that are too often dismissed as unsustainable.

Indexed as

Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeAdultCommunity Health ServicesCommunity Health WorkersFemaleHIV InfectionsHumansLeprosyLiberiaMaleMiddle AgedPatient ComplianceRetrospective StudiesSocioeconomic FactorsTreatment OutcomeTuberculosisCommunity health worker (CHW)health systems strengtheningobservational studypost-emergency settingsocioeconomic assistance

Identifiers

PMID30270812
PMCPMC7012017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.