Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30270457›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of haematology2019

Mate pair sequencing improves detection of genomic abnormalities in acute myeloid leukemia.

Umut Aypar, Stephanie A Smoley, Beth A Pitel, Kathryn E Pearce, Roman M Zenka, George Vasmatzis, Sarah H Johnson, James B Smadbeck, Jess F Peterson, Katherine B Geiersbach and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of haematology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The Prognostic Role of MYC Structural Variants Identified by NGS and FISH in Multiple Myeloma.Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Umut AyparDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Laboratory Genetics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2226-6163
Stephanie A SmoleyDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Laboratory Genetics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Beth A PitelDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Laboratory Genetics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Kathryn E PearceDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Laboratory Genetics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Roman M ZenkaBioinformatics Systems, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
George VasmatzisCenter for Individualized Medicine-Biomarker Discovery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Sarah H JohnsonCenter for Individualized Medicine-Biomarker Discovery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
James B SmadbeckCenter for Individualized Medicine-Biomarker Discovery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Jess F PetersonDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Laboratory Genetics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Katherine B GeiersbachDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Laboratory Genetics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Daniel L Van DykeDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Laboratory Genetics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Erik C ThorlandDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Laboratory Genetics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Robert B JenkinsDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Laboratory Genetics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Rhett P KetterlingDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Laboratory Genetics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Patricia T GreippDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Laboratory Genetics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Hutton M KearneyDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Laboratory Genetics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Nicole L HoppmanDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Laboratory Genetics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
Linda B BaughnDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Division of Laboratory Genetics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.

Funding

Mayo Clinic
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveAcute myeloid leukemia (AML) can be subtyped based on recurrent cytogenetic and molecular genetic abnormalities with diagnostic and prognostic significance. Although cytogenetic characterization classically involves conventional chromosome and/or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) assays, limitations of these techniques include poor resolution and the inability to precisely identify breakpoints.

methodWe evaluated whether an NGS-based methodology that detects structural abnormalities and copy number changes using mate pair sequencing (MPseq) can enhance the diagnostic yield for patients with AML.

resultsUsing 68 known abnormal and 20 karyotypically normal AML samples, each recurrent primary AML-specific abnormality previously identified in the abnormal samples was confirmed using MPseq. Importantly, in eight cases with abnormalities that could not be resolved by conventional cytogenetic studies, MPseq was utilized to molecularly define eight recurrent AML-fusion events. In addition, MPseq uncovered two cryptic abnormalities that were missed by conventional cytogenetic studies. Thus, MPseq improved the diagnostic yield in the detection of AML-specific structural rearrangements in 10/88 (11%) of cases analyzed.

conclusionUtilization of MPseq represents a precise, molecular-based technique that can be used as an alternative to conventional cytogenetic studies for newly diagnosed AML patients with the potential to revolutionize the diagnosis of hematologic malignancies.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsGenomicsSequence Analysis, DNAAgedComputational BiologyFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceKaryotypingLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMaleOncogene Proteins, FusionOncogene Proteins, Fusionacute myeloid leukemiamolecular cytogeneticsMPseq

Identifiers

PMID30270457
PMCPMC7379948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.