Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30270224›Full record

ArticleProgress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action2018

Defining and Measuring Community Engagement and Community-Engaged Research: Clinical and Translational Science Institutional Practices.

Milton Mickey Eder, Eunbyul Evans, Melanie Funes, Hui Hong, Katja Reuter, Syed Ahmed, Karen Calhoun, Giselle Corbie-Smith, Gaurav Dave, Mia DeFino and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Enhancing health research teams with CONTEXTperts.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. The development, validity, and reliability of the Researcher Investment Tool.Journal of clinical and translational science · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Milton Mickey Eder
Eunbyul Evans
Melanie Funes
Hui Hong
Katja Reuter
Syed Ahmed
Karen Calhoun
Giselle Corbie-Smith
Gaurav Dave
Mia DeFino
Eileen Harwood
Anne Kissack
Lawrence C Kleinman
Nina Wallerstein

Funding

Southern California Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001855 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Thomas A Buchanan, Michele D. Kipke · 2016 to 2026
$81.3M
Michigan Institute for Clinical and Health Research (MICHR)UL1TR002240 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI LUMENG, JULIE C, MASHOUR, GEORGE ALEXANDER · 2017 to 2022
$54.9M
North Carolina Translational & Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS)UL1TR001111 · NCATS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BUSE, JOHN BERNARD, CAREY, TIMOTHY S · 2013 to 2017
$43.9M
Southern California Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000130 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI BUCHANAN, THOMAS A · 2012 to 2015
$36.0M
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR000114 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R · 2012 to 2015
$35.0M
University of Minnesota Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UMN CTSI)UL1TR002494 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI BLAZAR, BRUCE R, WEISDORF, DANIEL J · 2018 to 2022
$34.9M
MOUNT SINAI INSTITUTES FOR CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCESUL1RR029887 · NCRR · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI MURPHY, BARBARA T. · 2009 to 2011
$19.2M
Clincal and Translational Science AwardUL1TR000055 · NCATS · MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN · PI SHAKER, REZA NONE · 2012 to 2015
$11.3M
University of New Mexico Clinical and Translational Science CenterUL1TR000041 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI LARSON, RICHARD S · 2012 to 2014
$9.8M
Transdisciplinary Research, Equity and Engagement Center for Advancing Behavioral HealthU54MD004811 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI CACARI STONE, LISA MARIE, CRUZ, THERESA · 2017 to 2022
$8.7M
Mount Sinai Collaboration for Advancing Pediatric Quality MeasuresU18HS020518 · AHRQ · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI KLEINMAN, LAWRENCE C · 2011 to 2014
$7.5M
Enhancing CBPR Practice through Provision of Expert Information SkillsR01NR015241 · NINR · UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO HEALTH SCIS CTR · PI WALLERSTEIN, NINA B · 2015 to 2019
$2.7M
AHRQ HHS T32 HS000036AHRQ HHS U18 HS020518NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000443NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000041NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000055NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000114NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000130NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001111NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001855NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002240NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002494NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR029887NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL105493NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD004811NINR NIH HHS R01 NR015241
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe institutions that comprise the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) consortium and the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences continue to explore and develop community-engaged research strategies and to study the role of community academic partnerships in advancing the science of community engagement.

objectivesTo explore CTSA institutions in relation to an Institute of Medicine recommendation that community engagement occur in all stages of translational research and be defined and evaluated consistently.

methodsA sequential multimethods study starting with an online pilot survey followed by survey respondents and site informant interviews. A revised survey was sent to the community engagement and evaluation leads at each CTSA institution, requesting a single institutional response about the definitions, indicators, and metrics of community engagement and community-engaged research.

resultsA plurality of CTSA institutions selected the definition of community engagement from the Principles of Community Engagement. Although claiming unique institutional priorities create barriers to developing shared metrics, responses indicate an overall lack of attention to the development and deployment of metrics to assess community engagement in and contributions to research.

conclusionsAlthough definitions of community engagement differ among CTSAs, there seem to be more similarities than differences in the indicators and measures tracked and reported on across all definitions, perhaps owing to commonalities among program infrastructures and goals. Metrics will likely need to be specific to translational research stages. The assessment of community engagement within translational science will require increased institutional commitment.

Indexed as

Advisory CommitteesCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchCommunity ParticipationHumansInterviews as TopicOrganizational ObjectivesPilot ProjectsSurveys and QuestionnairesTranslational Research, Biomedical

Identifiers

PMID30270224
PMCPMC6237095

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.