Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30270213›Full record

ArticleJournal of research in health sciences2018

Monitoring of Surveillance Quality Indicators of Measles in Iranian Districts: Analysis of Measles Surveillance System 2014-2016.

Seyed Mohsen Zahraei, Abolfazl Mohammadbeigi, Narges Mohammadsalehi, Azam Sabouri, Sima Afrashteh, Shahram Arsang Jang, Hossein Ansari, Salman Khazaei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of research in health sciences, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Measles Elimination Successful and Its Relevant Challenges in Iran.International journal of preventive medicine · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Seyed Mohsen ZahraeiCenter for Communicable Diseases Control, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran.
Abolfazl MohammadbeigiNeurology and Neurosciences Research Center, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran. beigi60@gmail.com.
Narges MohammadsalehiNeurology and Neurosciences Research Center, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
Azam SabouriCenter for Communicable Diseases Control, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran.
Sima AfrashtehVic-Chancellor for Public Health, Bushehr University of Medical Sciences, Bushehr, Iran.
Shahram Arsang JangResearch Center for Environmental Pollutants, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
Hossein AnsariHealth Promotion Research Center, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran.
Salman KhazaeiDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe elimination target for measles as an acute and contagious disease in Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR) and Iran is planned by high-quality surveillance. We aimed to monitor the surveillance quality indicators of measles by in all districts of Iran during 2014-16. STUDY

designA cross-sectional study.

methodsFour quality surveillance indicators of measles including non measles discarded rate, percent of suspected cases with adequate investigation, percent of adequate blood specimen collection and percent with timely availability of laboratory results were assessed in Iran. Surveillance data of measles were extracted from the measles surveillance system and the risk point score for each district was calculated based on WHO Risk Assessment Tool by a function of four indicators.

resultsOverall, 14312 suspected cases and 322 districts were assessed and the risk points of measles' quality surveillance showed that 92.8% of Iranian districts were categorized as low risk, 2.8% medium risk, 0.62% high risk and 3.73% very high-risk category. The appropriate non measles discarded rate indicator was 87.3%. The percent of suspected cases with adequate investigation (more than 2 per 100000 people) was 87.9%. Moreover, the average of percent adequate blood specimen collection and percent with timely availability of laboratory results was 85.16% and 85.71%, respectively in all Iranian districts.

conclusionsThe surveillance quality indicators in Iran were good and higher than the WHO plans. Increasing the percentage of non-measles discarded rate could improve the poor quality in high risk and very high-risk districts.

Indexed as

MeaslesPopulation SurveillanceCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansImmunization ProgramsIncidenceIranMaleRisk AssessmentSpecimen HandlingVaccinationEliminationIranMeaslesSurveillanceVaccination

Identifiers

PMID30270213
PMCPMC6941647

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.