Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30269876›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2018

Awareness of fetal movements and care package to reduce fetal mortality (AFFIRM): a stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial.

Jane E Norman, Alexander E P Heazell, Aryelly Rodriguez, Christopher J Weir, Sarah J E Stock, Catherine J Calderwood, Sarah Cunningham Burley, J Frederik Frøen, Michael Geary, Fionnuala Breathnach and 8 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT01777022 (Promoting Awareness Fetal Movements and Focussing Interventions Reduce Fetal Mortality Stillbirth, a Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomised Trial.), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
20.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01777022 nacompletednot on this map

Promoting Awareness Fetal Movements and Focussing Interventions Reduce Fetal Mortality Stillbirth, a Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomised Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of EdinburghRan2014 to 2017Enrolled430,830ConditionsDecreased Fetal Movements Affecting Care of Mother, Pregnancy, StillbirthArmsA package of interventions
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 176 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Risk Factors for Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Reduced Fetal Movement: An IPD Meta-Analysis.BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Fetal death: Expert consensus of the French College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Care pathways for reduced fetal movements: A cost-consequence analysis.The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. La Tunisie medicale · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 12 institutions in 3 countries.

Jane E NormanTommy's Centre for Maternal and Fetal Health, MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK. Electronic address: jane.norman@ed.ac.uk.
Alexander E P HeazellTommy's Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK; St Mary's Hospital, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, UK.
Aryelly RodriguezCentre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute of Population Health, Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Christopher J WeirCentre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute of Population Health, Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Sarah J E StockTommy's Centre for Maternal and Fetal Health, MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Catherine J CalderwoodThe Scottish Government, Edinburgh, UK.
Sarah Cunningham BurleyCentre for Population Health Sciences, Usher Institute of Population Health, Sciences and Informatics, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
J Frederik FrøenGlobal Health Cluster, Division for Health Services, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Michael GearyRotunda Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Fionnuala BreathnachRotunda Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Alyson HunterCentre for Fetal Medicine, Royal Maternity Hospital, Belfast, UK.
Fionnuala M McAuliffeUCD Perinatal Research Centre, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Mary F HigginsUCD Perinatal Research Centre, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Edile MurdochDepartment of Neonatology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, UK.
Mary Ross-DavieRoyal College of Midwives, Edinburgh, UK.
Janet ScottSands, Victoria Charity Centre, London, UK.
Sonia WhyteTommy's Centre for Maternal and Fetal Health, MRC Centre for Reproductive Health, Queen's Medical Research Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
AFFIRM investigators
Glasgow Centre for Population Health · GBMRC Centre for Reproductive Health · GBRotunda Hospital · IEUniversity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Edinburgh · GBEdinburgh Royal Infirmary · GBNorwegian Institute of Public Health · NOPrincess Royal Maternity Hospital · GBRoyal College of Midwives · GBSands · GBScottish Government · GBUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

Chief Scientist Office CZH/4/882Department of Health CS-2013-13-009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background2·6 million pregnancies were estimated to have ended in stillbirth in 2015. The aim of the AFFIRM study was to test the hypothesis that introduction of a reduced fetal movement (RFM), care package for pregnant women and clinicians that increased women's awareness of the need for prompt reporting of RFM and that standardised management, including timely delivery, would alter the incidence of stillbirth.

methodsThis stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial was done in the UK and Ireland. Participating maternity hospitals were grouped and randomised, using a computer-generated allocation scheme, to one of nine intervention implementation dates (at 3 month intervals). This date was concealed from clusters and the trial team until 3 months before the implementation date. Each participating hospital had three observation periods: a control period from Jan 1, 2014, until randomised date of intervention initiation; a washout period from the implementation date and for 2 months; and the intervention period from the end of the washout period until Dec 31, 2016. Treatment allocation was not concealed from participating women and caregivers. Data were derived from observational maternity data. The primary outcome was incidence of stillbirth. The primary analysis was done according to the intention-to-treat principle, with births analysed according to whether they took place during the control or intervention periods, irrespective of whether the intervention had been implemented as planned. This study is registered with www.ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01777022.

findings37 hospitals were enrolled in the study. Four hospitals declined participation, and 33 hospitals were randomly assigned to an intervention implementation date. Between Jan 1, 2014, and Dec, 31, 2016, data were collected from 409 175 pregnancies (157 692 deliveries during the control period, 23 623 deliveries in the washout period, and 227 860 deliveries in the intervention period). The incidence of stillbirth was 4·40 per 1000 births during the control period and 4·06 per 1000 births in the intervention period (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0·90, 95% CI 0·75-1·07; p=0·23).

interpretationThe RFM care package did not reduce the risk of stillbirths. The benefits of a policy that promotes awareness of RFM remains unproven.

fundingChief Scientist Office, Scottish Government (CZH/4/882), Tommy's Centre for Maternal and Fetal Health, Sands.

Indexed as

AwarenessFetal MovementAdultFemaleFetal DeathHumansIrelandPregnancyPrenatal CareStillbirthUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID30269876
PMCPMC6215771
OpenAlexW2892990748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.