Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30269396›Full record

ArticleThe European journal of neuroscience2020

Recurring circadian disruption alters circadian clock sensitivity to resetting.

Tanya L Leise, Ariella Goldberg, John Michael, Grace Montoya, Sabrina Solow, Penny Molyneux, Ramalingam Vetrivelan, Mary E Harrington

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The European journal of neuroscience, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Cell-Type-Specific Circadian Bioluminescence Rhythms inJournal of biological rhythms · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Evidence for Internal Desynchrony Caused by Circadian Clock Resetting.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tanya L LeiseDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Amherst College, Amherst, Massachusetts.
Ariella GoldbergDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Amherst College, Amherst, Massachusetts.
John MichaelDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Amherst College, Amherst, Massachusetts.
Grace MontoyaDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Amherst College, Amherst, Massachusetts.
Sabrina SolowDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, Amherst College, Amherst, Massachusetts.
Penny MolyneuxNeuroscience Program, Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts.
Ramalingam VetrivelanDepartment of Neurology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.
Mary E HarringtonNeuroscience Program, Smith College, Northampton, Massachusetts.ORCID 0000-0003-2266-6455
Amherst College · USSmith College · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · US

Funding

TRANSPLANTATION ANALYSIS OF CIRCADIAN RHYTHMS AND AGINGP01AG009975 · NIA · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SAPER, CLIFFORD B · 1991 to 2018
$23.1M
Neural mechanisms underlying REM sleep regulation by MCH neuronsR01NS088482 · NINDS · BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER · PI RAMALINGAM, VETRIVELAN · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
National Science Foundation NSF DBI-1129152NIA NIH HHS NIH NIA 5P01AG009975-20NIA NIH HHS P01 AG009975NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS088482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A single phase advance of the light:dark (LD) cycle can temporarily disrupt synchrony of neural circadian rhythms within the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) and between the SCN and peripheral tissues. Compounding this, modern life can involve repeated disruptive light conditions. To model chronic disruption to the circadian system, we exposed male mice to more than a month of a 20-hr light cycle (LD10:10), which mice typically cannot entrain to. Control animals were housed under LD12:12. We measured locomotor activity and body temperature rhythms in vivo, and rhythms of PER2::LUC bioluminescence in SCN and peripheral tissues ex vivo. Unexpectedly, we discovered strong effects of the time of dissection on circadian phase of PER2::LUC bioluminescent rhythms, which varied across tissues. White adipose tissue was strongly reset by dissection, while thymus phase appeared independent of dissection timing. Prior light exposure impacted the SCN, resulting in strong resetting of SCN phase by dissection for mice housed under LD10:10, and weak phase shifts by time of dissection in SCN from control LD12:12 mice. These findings suggest that exposure to circadian disruption may desynchronize SCN neurons, increasing network sensitivity to perturbations. We propose that tissues with a weakened circadian network, such as the SCN under disruptive light conditions, or with little to no coupling, for example, some peripheral tissues, will show increased resetting effects. In particular, exposure to light at inconsistent circadian times on a recurring weekly basis disrupts circadian rhythms and alters sensitivity of the SCN neural pacemaker to dissection time.

Indexed as

Circadian ClocksAnimalsCircadian RhythmMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMotor ActivityPeriod Circadian ProteinsSuprachiasmatic NucleusPeriod Circadian ProteinsadiposebioluminescencejetlagmicePER2thymus

Identifiers

PMID30269396
PMCPMC6441381
OpenAlexW2893905103

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.