Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30269281›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2018

Emissions, environmental levels, sources, formation pathways, and analysis of polybrominated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans: a review.

Yanxiao Zhou, Jinsong Liu

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Plastic Recycling Practices in Vietnam and Related Hazards for Health and the Environment.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yanxiao ZhouZhejiang University of Technology, No.18 Chaowang Road, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2056-4092
Jinsong LiuZhejiang University of Technology, No.18 Chaowang Road, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China. liu70923@163.com.

Funding

Environmental Protection Research Fund of Zhejiang province of China 2017A005Environmental Protection Research Fund of Zhejiang province of China 2017A006
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polybrominated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PBDD/Fs) were labeled potential persistent organic pollutants by the Stockholm Convention and have structures and toxicities similar to those of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/Fs), which has caused considerable concern. This article reviews the current available literature on the status, sources, formation pathways, and analysis of PBDD/Fs. PBDD/Fs are widely generated in industrial thermal processes, such as those for brominated flame retardant (BFR) products, e-waste dismantling, metal smelting processes, and waste incineration. PBDD/Fs can form via the following routes: precursor formation, de novo formation, biosynthesis, and natural formation. The levels of PBDD/Fs in the environment and in organisms and humans have increased due to extensive consumption and the increasing inventory of BFRs; thus, the risk of human exposure to PBDD/Fs is expected to be high.

Indexed as

DibenzofuransDioxinsElectronic WasteEnvironmental MonitoringEnvironmental PollutantsFlame RetardantsHumansHydrocarbons, BrominatedIncinerationdibenzo(1,4)dioxinDibenzofuransDioxinsEnvironmental PollutantsFlame RetardantsHydrocarbons, BrominatedAnalytical techniquesBrominated flame retardants (BFRs)Current statusFormation mechanismsPolybrominated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PBDD/Fs)Sources

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.