Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30269178›Full record

ArticleNeurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology2019

Expert recommendations for diagnosing cervical, oromandibular, and limb dystonia.

Giovanni Defazio, Alberto Albanese, Roberta Pellicciari, Cesa L Scaglione, Marcello Esposito, Francesca Morgante, Giovanni Abbruzzese, Anna R Bentivoglio, Francesco Bono, Mario Coletti Moja and 7 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Predictors of cognitive performance in idiopathic adult-onset dystonia.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Isolated Cervical Dystonia: Diagnosis and Classification.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Bayesian Interpretation of Essential Tremor Plus.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Exploring the presence of multiple abnormal non-motor features in patients with cervical dystonia.Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2021
    Article
  15. Dual task gait deteriorates gait performance in cervical dystonia patients: a pilot study.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Neuroimaging in idiopathic adult-onset focal dystonia.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.

Giovanni DefazioDepartment of Medical Sciences and Public Health, Neurology Unit, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy.
Alberto AlbaneseDepartment of Neurology, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Milan, Italy.
Roberta PellicciariDepartment of Basic Science, Neuroscience and Sense Organs, Aldo Moro University of Bari, Bari, Italy.
Cesa L ScaglioneIRCCS Institute of Neurological Sciences, Bologna, Italy.
Marcello EspositoDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive Science and Dentistry, Federico II University of Naples, Naples, Italy.
Francesca MorganteDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Giovanni AbbruzzeseDepartment of Neuroscience, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics and Maternal Child Health and Department of Experimental Medicine, Section of Human Physiology, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Anna R BentivoglioCenter for Parkinson's Disease and Extrapyramidal Disorders, Movement Disorders Unit, Institute of Neurology, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
Francesco BonoNeurology Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, Catanzaro, Italy.
Mario Coletti MojaNeurology Unit, Umberto I Hospital, Turin, Italy.
Giovanni FabbriniDepartment of Neurology and Psychiatry, Sapienza University of Rome, and Neuromed Institute IRCCS, Pozzilli, Italy.
Paolo GirlandaDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Messina, Messina, Italy.
Leonardo LopianoDepartment of Neuroscience "Rita Levi Montalcini", University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Claudio PacchettiParkinson's Disease and Movement Disorders Unit, IRCCS Neurological National Institute C. Mondino, Pavia, Italy.
Marcello RomanoNeurology Unit, Villa Sofia Hospital, Palermo, Italy.
Laura FaddaDepartment of Medical Sciences and Public Health, Neurology Unit, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy. fadda_laura@yahoo.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9990-2287
Alfredo BerardelliDepartment of Neurology and Psychiatry, Sapienza University of Rome, and Neuromed Institute IRCCS, Pozzilli, Italy.
Istituto Neurologico Mediterraneo · ITUniversity of Cagliari · ITUniversity of Messina · ITCatholic University of America · USFondazione Humanitas per la Ricerca · ITInstitute of Neurological Sciences · ITMagna Graecia University · ITOspedale Vincenzo Cervello · ITPoliclinico Umberto I · ITUniversity of Bari Aldo Moro · ITUniversity of Genoa · ITUniversity of Naples Federico II · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiagnosis of focal dystonia is based on clinical grounds and is therefore open to bias. To date, diagnostic guidelines have been only proposed for blepharospasm and laryngeal dystonia. To provide practical guidance for clinicians with less expertise in dystonia, a group of Italian Movement Disorder experts formulated clinical diagnostic recommendations for cervical, oromandibular, and limb dystonia.

methodsA panel of four neurologists generated a list of clinical items related to the motor phenomenology of the examined focal dystonias and a list of clinical features characterizing neurological/non-neurological conditions mimicking dystonia. Thereafter, ten additional expert neurologists assessed the diagnostic relevance of the selected features and the content validity ratio was calculated. The clinical features reaching a content validity ratio > 0.5 contributed to the final recommendations.

resultsThe recommendations retained patterned and repetitive movements/postures as the core feature of dystonia in different body parts. If present, a sensory trick confirmed diagnosis of dystonia. In the patients who did not manifest sensory trick, active exclusion of clinical features related to conditions mimicking dystonia (features that would be expected to be absent in dystonia) would be necessary for dystonia to be diagnosed. DISCUSSION: Although reliability, sensitivity, and specificity of the recommendations are yet to be demonstrated, information from the present study would hopefully facilitate diagnostic approach to focal dystonias in the clinical practice and would be the basis for future validated diagnostic guidelines.

Indexed as

DystoniaDystonic DisordersExpert TestimonyHumansItalyMovement DisordersNeurologistsTorticollisDiagnosisFocal dystoniaPseudodystonia

Identifiers

PMID30269178
OpenAlexW2894463365

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.