Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30269010›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2019

Biocatalytic hydrogen atom transfer: an invigorating approach to free-radical reactions.

Yuji Nakano, Kyle F Biegasiewicz, Todd K Hyster

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Photobiocatalytic Enantioselective Benzylic C(spJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Radical Activation of N-H and O-H Bonds at Bismuth(II).Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Activation modes in biocatalytic radical cyclization reactions.Journal of industrial microbiology & biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuji NakanoDepartment of Chemistry, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
Kyle F BiegasiewiczDepartment of Chemistry, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.
Todd K HysterDepartment of Chemistry, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA. Electronic address: thyster@princeton.edu.

Funding

Hyster (Rivas-Souchet) Diversity SupplementR01GM127703 · NIGMS · PRINCETON UNIVERSITY · PI Todd Kurt Hyster · 2018 to 2026
$2.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM127703
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Initiating and terminating free-radical reactionis via hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) is an attractive means of avoiding substrate prefunctionalization. Small molecule catalysts and reagents, however, struggle to execute this fundamental step with useful levels of diastereoselectivity and enantioselectivity. In contrast, nature often carries out HAT with exquisite levels of selectivity for even electronically unactivated carbon-hydrogen bonds. By understanding how enzymes exploit and control this fundamental step, new strategies can be developed to address several long-standing challenges in free-radical reactions. This review will cover recent discoveries in biocatalysis that exploit a HAT mechanism to either initiate or terminate novel one-electron reactions.

Indexed as

BiocatalysisFree RadicalsHydrogenHydrogen BondingFree RadicalsHydrogen

Identifiers

PMID30269010
PMCPMC6437003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.