Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30268991›Full record

ArticleNeuroImage. Clinical2018

A new visual rating scale for Ioflupane imaging in Lewy body disease.

Jim J Lloyd, George Petrides, Paul C Donaghy, Sean J Colloby, Johannes Attems, John T O'Brien, Gemma Roberts, Alan J Thomas

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Dementia with Lewy bodies: an update and outlook.Molecular neurodegeneration · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jim J LloydNuclear Medicine Department, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, United Kingdom; Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 5PL, United Kingdom. Electronic address: j.j.lloyd@ncl.ac.uk.
George PetridesNuclear Medicine Department, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, United Kingdom.
Paul C DonaghyInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 5PL, United Kingdom.
Sean J CollobyInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 5PL, United Kingdom.
Johannes AttemsInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 5PL, United Kingdom.
John T O'BrienDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Cambridge, School of Clinical Medicine, Box 189, Level E4 Cambridge Biomedical Campus, Cambridge CB2 0SP, United Kingdom.
Gemma RobertsNuclear Medicine Department, Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 4LP, United Kingdom; Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 5PL, United Kingdom.
Alan J ThomasInstitute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Campus for Ageing and Vitality, Newcastle upon Tyne NE4 5PL, United Kingdom.
Newcastle Hospitals - Campus for Ageing and Vitality · GBRoyal Victoria Infirmary · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0400074
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDopaminergic loss on

objectivesWe aimed to develop a new visual rating scale for

methodsFour experienced observers developed and tested a new scale consisting of two metrics, reflecting overall loss and heterogeneity of loss. 66 subjects were used during development including clinical diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease (n = 14), Parkinson's disease (n = 9), Parkinson's disease dementia (n = 9), dementia with Lewy bodies (n = 15) and normal controls (n = 19). The scale was then tested on an independent group of 46 subjects with autopsy confirmed diagnosis: Alzheimer's disease (n = 11), Parkinson's disease (n = 3), Parkinson's disease dementia (n = 15), dementia with Lewy bodies (n = 12), normal controls (n = 4) and Frontotemporal dementia (n = 1).

resultsIn the autopsy validation the sensitivity and specificity of the new scale for Lewy body disease was 97% and 100% respectively, compared with the standard scale which had the same sensitivity (97%), but lower specificity (80%). The new scale had excellent inter rater reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient 0.93).

conclusionA new robust and reliable rating scale is described that straightforwardly captures the visual appearance of

Indexed as

NortropanesAgedAged, 80 and overAlzheimer DiseaseBrainFemaleHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLewy Body DiseaseMaleParkinson DiseaseReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonioflupaneNortropanesDementia with Lewy bodiesDopaminergic imagingFP-CITLewy body diseaseLoflupaneVisual rating

Identifiers

PMID30268991
PMCPMC6169248
OpenAlexW2890568232

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.