Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30268767›Full record

ArticleExperimental neurology2019

Engaging pain fibers after a spinal cord injury fosters hemorrhage and expands the area of secondary injury.

Joel D Turtle, Melissa K Henwood, Misty M Strain, Yung-Jen Huang, Rajesh C Miranda, James W Grau

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Joel D TurtleCellular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA. Electronic address: joelturtle@gmail.com.
Melissa K HenwoodCellular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA. Electronic address: mkbrumley410449@tamu.edu.
Misty M StrainCellular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Yung-Jen HuangChemPartner, 998 Halei Rd., Zhangjiang Hi-Tech Park, Pudong New Area Shanghai, 201203, China.
Rajesh C MirandaNeuroscience and Experimental Therapeutics, College of Medicine, Texas A&M University, Bryan, TX 77807, USA. Electronic address: miranda@medicine.tamhsc.edu.
James W GrauCellular and Behavioral Neuroscience, Department of Psychology, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA. Electronic address: j-grau@tamu.edu.
Texas A&M University · USShanghai Zhangjiang Laboratory · CNTexas A&M Health Science Center · US

Funding

Nociceptive input after spinal cord injury (SCI) expands the region of secondary injury and undermines long-term recoveryR01NS104422 · NINDS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI GRAU, JAMES WILLIAM · 2018 to 2022
$1.5M
Effect of inflammation on recovery and pain after spinal cord injuryR21NS091723 · NINDS · TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY · PI GRAU, JAMES WILLIAM · 2016 to 2017
$402k
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS104422NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS091723NINDS NIH HHS R56 NS104422
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In humans, spinal cord injury (SCI) is often accompanied by additional tissue damage (polytrauma) that can engage pain (nociceptive) fibers. Prior work has shown that this nociceptive input can expand the area of tissue damage (secondary injury), undermine behavioral recovery, and enhance the development of chronic pain. Here, it is shown that nociceptive input given a day after a lower thoracic contusion injury in rats enhances the infiltration of red blood cells at the site of injury, producing an area of hemorrhage that expands secondary injury. Peripheral nociceptive fibers were engaged 24 h after injury by means of electrical stimulation (shock) applied at an intensity that engages unmyelinated pain (C) fibers or through the application of the irritant capsaicin. Convergent western immunoblot and cyanmethemoglobin colorimetric assays showed that both forms of stimulation increased the concentration of hemoglobin at the site of injury, with a robust effect observed 3-24 h after stimulation. Histopathology confirmed that shock treatment increased the area of hemorrhage and the infiltration of red blood cells. SCI can lead to hemorrhage by engaging the sulfonylurea receptor 1 (SUR1) transient receptor potential melastatin 4 (TRPM4) channel complex in neurovascular endothelial cells, which leads to cell death and capillary fragmentation. Histopathology confirmed that areas of hemorrhage showed capillary fragmentation. Co-immunoprecipitation of the SUR1-TRPM4 complex showed that it was up-regulated by noxious stimulation. Shock-induced hemorrhage was associated with an acute disruption in locomotor performance. These results imply that noxious stimulation impairs long-term recovery because it amplifies the breakdown of the blood spinal cord barrier (BSCB) and the infiltration of red blood cells, which expands the area of secondary injury.

Indexed as

AnimalsHematoma, Epidural, SpinalMaleNerve Fibers, UnmyelinatedPainPain MeasurementRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySpinal Cord InjuriesThoracic VertebraeBlood spinal cord barrierHemorrhageNociceptionPainPolytraumaProgressive hemorrhagic necrosisSecondary injurySpinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID30268767
PMCPMC6530785
OpenAlexW2893849361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.