Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30268159›Full record

ArticleMilitary Medical Research2018

An improved formula for standard hypoxia tolerance time (STT) to evaluate hypoxic tolerance in mice.

Gang Xu, Yu-Qi Gao, Yi-Xing Gao, Gang Wu, Jian-Yang Zhang, Wen-Xiang Gao

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Military Medical Research, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Pharmacological Effect ofBioMed research international · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gang XuInstitute of Medicine and Hygienic Equipment for High Altitude Region, College of High Altitude Military Medicine, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China.
Yu-Qi GaoInstitute of Medicine and Hygienic Equipment for High Altitude Region, College of High Altitude Military Medicine, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China.
Yi-Xing GaoKey Laboratory of High Altitude Medicine, People's Liberation Army, Chongqing, 400038, China.
Gang WuInstitute of Medicine and Hygienic Equipment for High Altitude Region, College of High Altitude Military Medicine, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China.
Jian-Yang ZhangInstitute of Medicine and Hygienic Equipment for High Altitude Region, College of High Altitude Military Medicine, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China.
Wen-Xiang GaoInstitute of Medicine and Hygienic Equipment for High Altitude Region, College of High Altitude Military Medicine, Army Medical University (Third Military Medical University), Chongqing, 400038, China. winneygaocn@aliyun.com.ORCID 0000-0002-9077-2359
Army Medical University · CN

Funding

Consultative Project of Transformation Medicine in Southwest Hospital of the Third Military Medical University SWH2014ZH05National Natural Science Foundation of China (CN) No. 81071610National Natural Science Foundation of China (CN) No. 81471814
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHypoxia is a primary cause of mountain sickness and a common pathological condition in patients with heart failure, shock, stroke, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Thus far, little advancement in countering hypoxic damage has been achieved, and one of the main reasons is the absence of an ideal algorithm or calculation method to normalize hypoxia tolerance scores when evaluating an animal model. In this study, we improved a traditional calculation formula for assessment of hypoxia tolerance.

methodsWe used a sealed bottle model in which the oxygen is gradually consumed by a mouse inside. To evaluate the hypoxia tolerance of mice, the survival time (ST) of the mouse is recorded and was used to calculate standard hypoxia tolerance time (STT) and adjusted standard hypoxia tolerance time (ASTT). Mice administered with methazolamide and saline were used as positive and negative controls, respectively.

resultsSince mice were grouped according to either body weight (BW) or bottle volume, we found a strongly negative correlation between STT and BW instead of between STT and bottle volume, suggesting that different BWs could cause false positive or negative errors in the STT results. Furthermore, both false positive and negative errors could be rectified when ASTT was used as the evaluation index. Screening for anti-hypoxic medicines by using mice as the experimental subjects would provide more credible results with the improved ASTT method than with the STT method.

conclusionASTT could be a better index than STT for the evaluation of hypoxia tolerance abilities as it could eliminate the impact of animal BW.

Indexed as

Body WeightAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFalse Positive ReactionsHypoxiaMaleMiceOxygenTime FactorsOxygenBody weightHypoxiaMice modelStandard hypoxic tolerance time

Identifiers

PMID30268159
PMCPMC6164180
OpenAlexW2894389371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.