Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30268143›Full record

ArticleHealth research policy and systems2018

Building capacity in primary care rehabilitation clinical practice guidelines: a South African initiative.

Q Louw, K Grimmer, J M Dizon, S Machingaidze, H Parker, D Ernstzen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health research policy and systems, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Perceptions of integrated rehabilitation service delivery in a metropolitan district.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Rehabilitation and primary care treatment guidelines, South Africa.Bulletin of the World Health Organization · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. A chasm: Consequences of poor collaboration between health and education in paediatric cerebral palsy care in Johannesburg.The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Q LouwDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Francie van Zijl Drive, Tygerberg, Cape Town, 7505, South Africa. qalouw@sun.ac.za.
K GrimmerDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Francie van Zijl Drive, Tygerberg, Cape Town, 7505, South Africa.
J M DizonInternational Centre for Allied Health Evidence, University of South Australia, City East Campus, Adelaide, 5000, Australia.
S MachingaidzeSouth African Cochrane Centre, South African Medical Research Council, Francie van Zijl Drive, Parow Valley, Cape Town, 7505, South Africa.
H ParkerDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Francie van Zijl Drive, Tygerberg, Cape Town, 7505, South Africa.
D ErnstzenDepartment of Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Francie van Zijl Drive, Tygerberg, Cape Town, 7505, South Africa.
Stellenbosch University · ZAFlinders University · AUSouth African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversity of South Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe large number of South Africans with disability who cannot access good quality rehabilitation presents a public health and human rights challenge. A cost-effective, efficient approach is required to address this. Implementation of high-quality, contextually relevant clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) could be a solution; however, this requires significant investment in innovative capacity-building.

methodsA qualitative descriptive national study was conducted to explore the perspectives of South African stakeholders in rehabilitation, regarding CPG capacity-building. Twenty rehabilitation professionals (physiotherapists, occupational therapists, speech language therapists, podiatrists, rehabilitation managers or directors) were interviewed. Transcribed interview data were analysed using a deductive content analysis approach, mapping findings to an international capacity-building framework to produce new knowledge.

resultsCapacity-building is required in content, purpose and construction of locally relevant CPGs, as well as personal, workforce and systems capacity. Principles and strategies were derived to underpin implementation of CPGs that are user friendly, context specific, relevant to the needs of end-users, and achievable within available resources. Collaboration, networks and communication are required at national, provincial and regional level, within and between sectors. A central agency for CPG methods, writing, implementation and evaluation is indicated.

conclusionSouth African rehabilitation can benefit from a multi-level CPG capacity-building focusing on performance, personal, workforce and systems issues.

Indexed as

Allied Health PersonnelCapacity BuildingHealth PolicyHealth Services AccessibilityPractice Guidelines as TopicPrimary Health CareHealth ResourcesHumansPersons with DisabilitiesPublic HealthQualitative ResearchSouth AfricaSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID30268143
PMCPMC6162960
OpenAlexW2894425360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.