ArticleiScience2018
DNA Motif Recognition Modeling from Protein Sequences.
Article in iScience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Properties of Putative APSES Transcription Factor AfpA inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Discovering DNA shape motifs with multiple DNA shape features: generalization, methods, and validation.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Biolayer interferometry for DNA-protein interactions.PloS one · 2022Article
- Genome-Wide Identification and Functional Characterization of GATA Transcription Factor Gene Family inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Transcription factor control of virulence in phytopathogenic fungi.Molecular plant pathology · 2021Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although the existing works on DNA motif discovery on DNA sequences are plethoric, mechanistic knowledge to infer DNA motifs from protein sequences across multiple DNA-binding domain families without conducting any wet-lab experiments is still lacking. Therefore, the k-spectrum recognition modeling is proposed to address the issues at the highest possible resolutions. The k-spectrum model can capture DNA motif patterns from protein sequences at the resolution in which local sequence context and nucleotide dependency can be taken into account completely. Multiple evaluation metrics are adopted and measured on millions of k-mer binding intensities from 92 proteins across 5 DNA-binding families (i.e., bHLH, bZIP, ETS, Forkhead, and Homeodomain), demonstrating its competitive edges. In addition, it not only can contribute to DNA motif recognition modeling but also can help prioritize the observed or even unobserved binding of single nucleotide variants on transcription factor binding sites in a genome-wide manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.