Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30267559›Full record

ArticleGlobal change biology2018

Global projections of future cropland expansion to 2050 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon storage.

Amy Molotoks, Elke Stehfest, Jonathan Doelman, Fabrizio Albanito, Nuala Fitton, Terence P Dawson, Pete Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global change biology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Reversing the great degradation of nature by reducing factors related to cropland expansion.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Molecular analysis of the reactions inFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Salt Stress Tolerance inPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Amy MolotoksInstitute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1168-1580
Elke StehfestPBL Netherlands, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Jonathan DoelmanPBL Netherlands, The Hague, The Netherlands.
Fabrizio AlbanitoInstitute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Nuala FittonInstitute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Terence P DawsonDepartment of Geography, King's College London, London, UK.
Pete SmithInstitute of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3784-1124

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) BB/Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) M010996/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cropland expansion threatens biodiversity by driving habitat loss and impacts carbon storage through loss of biomass and soil carbon (C). There is a growing concern land-use change (LUC) to cropland will result in a loss of ecosystem function and various ecosystem services essential for human health and well-being. This paper examines projections of future cropland expansion from an integrated assessment model IMAGE 3.0 under a "business as usual" scenario and the direct impact on both biodiversity and C storage. By focusing on biodiversity hotspots and Alliance for Zero Extinction (AZE) sites, loss of habitat as well as potential impacts on endangered and critically endangered species are explored. With regards to C storage, the impact on both soil and vegetation standing C stocks are examined. We show that if projected trends are realized, there are likely to be severe consequences for these resources. Substantial loss of habitat in biodiversity hotspots such as Indo-Burma, and the Philippians is expected as well as 50% of species in AZE sites losing part of their last remaining habitat. An estimated 13.7% of vegetation standing C stocks and 4.6% of soil C stocks are also projected to be lost in areas affected with Brazil and Mexico being identified as priorities in terms of both biodiversity and C losses from cropland expansion. Changes in policy to regulate projected cropland expansion, and increased measures to protect natural resources, are highly likely to be required to prevent these biodiversity and C losses in the future.

Indexed as

BiodiversityCarbon SequestrationCrops, AgriculturalAgricultureBrazilCarbonConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemForecastingHumansMexicoModels, TheoreticalCarbonbiodiversitycarbon storagecropland expansionecosystem servicesland use change

Identifiers

PMID30267559
PMCPMC6282572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.