Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30267427›Full record

ArticleTransfusion2019

Blood, sweat, and tears: Red Blood Cell-Omics study objectives, design, and recruitment activities.

Stacy M Endres-Dighe, Yuelong Guo, Tamir Kanias, Marion Lanteri, Mars Stone, Bryan Spencer, Ritchard G Cable, Joseph E Kiss, Steve Kleinman, Mark T Gladwin and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transfusion, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Genetic determinants of plasma testosterone in male blood donors are associated with altered red blood cell characteristics and survival in cold storage and after transfusion.Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Stacy M Endres-DigheRTI International, Rockville, Maryland.
Yuelong GuoRTI International, Durham, North Carolina.
Tamir KaniasPittsburgh Heart, Lung, Blood and Vascular Medicine Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.ORCID 0000-0001-6558-0913
Marion LanteriBlood Systems Research Institute, San Francisco, California.
Mars StoneBlood Systems Research Institute, San Francisco, California.
Bryan SpencerAmerican Red Cross, Farmington, Connecticut.
Ritchard G CableAmerican Red Cross, Farmington, Connecticut.
Joseph E KissThe Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Steve KleinmanUniversity of British Columbia, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Mark T GladwinPittsburgh Heart, Lung, Blood and Vascular Medicine Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Donald J BrambillaRTI International, Rockville, Maryland.
Pam D'AndreaThe Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Darrell J TriulziThe Institute for Transfusion Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Alan E MastBloodCenter of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Grier P PageRTI International, Atlanta, Georgia.
Michael P BuschBlood Systems Research Institute, San Francisco, California.
NHLBI Recipient Epidemiology Donor Evaluation Study (REDS)-III Program

Funding

Storage Lesion in Banked Blood Due to Disruption of Nitric Oxide HomeostasisR01HL098032 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Mark T Gladwin · 2009 to 2026
$12.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100002INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100004INHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201100008INHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL098032
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Red Blood Cell (RBC)-Omics study was initiated to build a large data set containing behavioral, genetic, and biochemical characteristics of blood donors with linkage to outcomes of the patients transfused with their donated RBCs. STUDY DESIGN AND

methodsThe cohort was recruited from four US blood centers. Demographic and donation data were obtained from center records. A questionnaire to assess pica, restless leg syndrome, iron supplementation, hormone use, and menstrual and pregnancy history was completed at enrollment. Blood was obtained for a complete blood count, DNA, and ferritin testing. A leukocyte-reduced RBC sample was transferred to a custom storage bag for hemolysis testing at Storage Days 39 to 42. A subset was recalled to evaluate the kinetics and stability of hemolysis measures.

resultsA total of 13,403 racially/ethnically diverse (12% African American, 12% Asian, 8% Hispanic, 64% white, and 5% multiracial/other) donors of both sexes were enrolled and ranged from 18 to 90 years of age; 15% were high-intensity donors (nine or more donations in the prior 24 mo without low hemoglobin deferral). Data elements are available for 97% to 99% of the cohort.

conclusionsThe cohort provides demographic, behavioral, biochemical, and genetic data for a broad range of blood donor studies related to iron metabolism, adverse consequences of iron deficiency, and differential hemolysis (including oxidative and osmotic stress perturbations) during RBC storage. Linkage to recipient outcomes may permit analysis of how donor characteristics affect transfusion efficacy. Repository DNA, plasma, and RBC samples should expand the usefulness of the current data set.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBloodBlood DonorsBlood PreservationErythrocytesFemaleGenotypeHemolysisHumansKineticsMaleMetabolomicsMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID30267427
PMCPMC6361628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.