Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30267359›Full record

ArticleJournal of chemical ecology2018

Differential Impact of Herbivores from Three Feeding Guilds on Systemic Secondary Metabolite Induction, Phytohormone Levels and Plant-Mediated Herbivore Interactions.

Michael Eisenring, Gaetan Glauser, Michael Meissle, Jörg Romeis

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of chemical ecology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Different responses of two maize cultivars toFrontiers in plant science · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Improvement ofBiology · 2022
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael EisenringAgroscope, Research Division Agroecology and Environment, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4756-7982
Gaetan GlauserNeuchâtel Platform of Analytical Chemistry, University of Neuchâtel, Avenue de Bellevaux 51, 2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Michael MeissleAgroscope, Research Division Agroecology and Environment, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046, Zurich, Switzerland.
Jörg RomeisAgroscope, Research Division Agroecology and Environment, Reckenholzstrasse 191, 8046, Zurich, Switzerland. joerg.romeis@agroscope.admin.ch.
Agroscope · CHUniversity of Neuchâtel · CH

Funding

Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung 31003A-149794
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phytochemical defense responses of plants are often herbivore-specific and can be affected by a herbivore's feeding mode. However, comprehensive studies documenting the impact of multiple herbivores from different feeding guilds on induced phytochemical responses in distal leaves and its consequences for plant-mediated herbivore interactions are limited and findings are inconsistent. We investigated how herbivory by leaf-chewing caterpillars, cell-content feeding spider mites and phloem-feeding aphids and whiteflies affect secondary metabolomes and phytohormone levels in youngest, non-damaged cotton leaves (distal leaves). Furthermore, bioassays with caterpillars were conducted to assess their performance on distal leaves of plants infested with different herbivores. Caterpillars, and to a lesser degree spider mites, led to a systemic induction of terpenoids with negative consequences for caterpillar performance in the bioassays. Both herbivores reduced levels of various nutrients and potentially antioxidative compounds. Caterpillar damage increased levels of jasmonoyl-L-isoleucine and abscisic acid (ABA), whereas spider mite infestation had no effect on phytohormone levels. Aphid and whitefly infestation did not systemically affect secondary metabolites. Aphids decreased salicylic acid levels while whitefly-infested plants contained increased ABA levels. Neither aphid nor whitefly infestation affected caterpillar performance. In general, feeding mode of a herbivore can affect systemically induced changes in phytochemistry and plant-mediated indirect interactions even though the two phloem-feeding herbivores triggered different phytohormonal responses. The observed reduction of nutrients and potentially antioxidative compounds upon caterpillar and spider mite herbivory underlines the importance of further elucidating the role of resource sequestration as a potential systemic defensive response following herbivory by chewers and cell-content feeding herbivores.

Indexed as

MetabolomicsAbscisic AcidAnimalsAphidsCyclopentanesGossypiumHerbivoryHost-Parasite InteractionsIsoleucineLarvaPlant Growth RegulatorsPlant LeavesTerpenesAbscisic AcidCyclopentanesIsoleucinejasmonoyl-isoleucinePlant Growth RegulatorsTerpenesAbscisic acidDefense inductionDistal leavesFeeding modeGossypium hirsutumHerbivoryJasmonic acidTerpenoids

Identifiers

PMID30267359
OpenAlexW2893624996

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.