Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30267224›Full record

ReviewCurrent diabetes reports2018

Diabetes, Depression, and Cognition: a Recursive Cycle of Cognitive Dysfunction and Glycemic Dysregulation.

Sheila Black, Kyle Kraemer, Avani Shah, Gaynell Simpson, Forrest Scogin, Annie Smith

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current diabetes reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. From Metabolic Syndrome to Neurological Diseases: Role of Autophagy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sheila BlackDepartment of Psychology, University of Alabama, Box 870348, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35487, USA. sblack@ua.edu.
Kyle KraemerDepartment of Psychology, University of Alabama, Box 870348, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35487, USA.
Avani ShahSchool of Social Work, University of Alabama, Box 870314, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35401, USA.
Gaynell SimpsonSchool of Social Work, University of Alabama, Box 870314, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35401, USA.
Forrest ScoginDepartment of Psychology, University of Alabama, Box 870348, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35487, USA.
Annie SmithDepartment of Psychology, University of Alabama, Box 870348, Tuscaloosa, AL, 35487, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe study aims to examine the effects of diabetes and depression on executive functioning (EF) and to review the effects of EF deficits on diabetes management. RECENT

findingsBoth type 2 diabetes and depression influence EF, and in turn, EF has an impact on diabetes management. Individuals with both comorbidities (i.e., diabetes and depression) experience greater deficits in EF than individuals with just one of the morbidities (i.e., depression or diabetes). The disruption in EF results in poor diabetes management and poor emotion regulation which ultimately increases the probability of a recursive cycle of depression and hyperglycemia. This recursive cycle can ultimately lead to diabetes-related complications.

Indexed as

CognitionBlood GlucoseCognitive DysfunctionDepressionDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Executive FunctionHumansBlood GlucoseDepressionDiabetesExecutive processingMemory

Identifiers

PMID30267224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.