Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30267217›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2018

The identification of induction chemo-sensitivity genes of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma and their clinical utilization.

Lianhe Li, Ru Wang, Shizhi He, Xixi Shen, Fanyong Kong, Shuchun Li, Huanhu Zhao, Meng Lian, Jugao Fang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Lianhe LiBeijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6810-9737
Ru WangBeijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shizhi HeBeijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xixi ShenBeijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Fanyong KongThe Hospital of Shunyi District Beijing, Beijing, China.
Shuchun LiSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Minzu University of China, Beijing, China.
Huanhu ZhaoSchool of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Minzu University of China, Beijing, China.
Meng LianBeijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. lianmeng19861222@163.com.
Jugao FangBeijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China. fangjugao@163.com.
Beijing Tongren Hospital · CNMinzu University of China · CNShunyi Hospital of Beijing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital · CN

Funding

Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Clinical Medicine Development of Special Funding Support XMLX201311Sponsored by Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Incubating Program PX2018009The Basic-Clinical Cooperation Fund, Capital Medical University 17JL76The Golden Bridge Project, Beijing JQ17031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo identify potential molecular markers for induction chemotherapy of Laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC).

methodsDifferently expressed genes between chemo-sensitive group (seven cases) and chemo-insensitive (five cases) group after induction chemotherapy by TPF were identified by microarrays. Bayes network and Random forest analyses were employed to identify core genes for induction chemotherapy. The diagnostic value of these core genes was also evaluated by ROC analysis.

resultsSix genes (SPP1, FOLR3, KYNU, LOC653219, ADH7 and XAGE1A) are highly expressed, while seven gene (CADM1, NDUFA4L2, CCND2, RARRES3, ERAP2, LYD6 and CNTNAP2) present significantly low expression. Among these genes, genes CADM1, FOLR3, KYNU, and CNTNAP2 are core candidates for LSCC chemo-sensitivity. And that the low expression of CADM1 may result in chemo-sensitivity, which leads to high expression of gene FOLR3 and KYNU, and low expression of gene CNTNAP2. Besides, ROC analysis shows that these four genes exhibit effective diagnostic value for induction chemo-sensitivity.

conclusionsCADM1 may be a potential molecular marker for LSCC induction chemotherapy, while CADM1, FOLR3, KYNU, and CNTNAP2 may provide essential guidance for LSCC diagnosis and follow-up treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Induction ChemotherapyAgedCarcinoma, Squamous CellCarrier ProteinsCell Adhesion Molecule-1Drug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleGene Expression ProfilingGenetic MarkersHumansLaryngeal NeoplasmsMaleMembrane ProteinsMicroarray AnalysisMiddle AgedNerve Tissue ProteinsCADM1 protein, humanCarrier ProteinsCell Adhesion Molecule-1CNTNAP2 protein, humanFOLR3 protein, humanGenetic MarkersMembrane ProteinsNerve Tissue ProteinsRNA, ComplementaryChemo-sensitivityInduction chemotherapyLaryngeal squamous cell carcinomaMolecular marker

Identifiers

PMID30267217
OpenAlexW2893990952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.