Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30267216›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2018

Computed tomography accelerates staging in patients with Merkel cell carcinoma.

Elisabeth Foki, Alexandra Fochtmann-Frana, Georg Haymerle, Stefan Nemec, Benjamin Loader, Christos Perisanidis, Boban M Erovic

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elisabeth FokiDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Alexandra Fochtmann-FranaDepartment of Surgery, Clinical Division of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Georg HaymerleDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Stefan NemecDepartment of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology and Musculoskeletal Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Benjamin LoaderDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Rudolfstiftung Teaching Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
Christos PerisanidisDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Boban M ErovicDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. boban.erovic@meduniwien.ac.at.
Medical University of Vienna · ATRudolfinerhaus Hospital · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNo imaging algorithms for diagnostic imaging in patients suffering from Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) have been established so far and thus staging work-up is challenging. Long presentation-to-treatment intervals determine further treatment course and, consequently, have an impact on clinical outcome in patients with MCC.

methodsIn this retrospective study, diagnostic imaging of 37 MCC patients was analyzed. CT, ultrasound, and PET/PET-CT imaging for primary staging work-up with time frames from patients´ initial presentation and imaging until completion of tumor staging were analyzed.

resultsTumor staging could be completed earlier when (1) less examinations (35 vs. 42 days) were carried out or (2) computed tomography was used as the initial imaging modality (28 vs. 35 days). Furthermore, CT imaging, when used as the initial imaging study, was linked to less follow-up imaging (3 vs. 6).

conclusionComputed tomography as the first-staging imaging technique in MCC patients leads to less follow-up studies and fastest completion of tumor staging.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAlgorithmsCarcinoma, Merkel CellFemaleHumansLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRetrospective StudiesSkin NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyCancerComputerized tomographyDiagnosisImagingSkinUltrasound

Identifiers

PMID30267216
PMCPMC6244682
OpenAlexW2894135249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.