Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30267169›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2018

Implications of stx loss for clinical diagnostics of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli.

Thulasika Senthakumaran, Lin Torstensen Brandal, Bjørn-Arne Lindstedt, Silje Bakken Jørgensen, Colin Charnock, Hege Smith Tunsjø

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Whole-Genome Sequencing Analysis of aDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Thulasika SenthakumaranDepartment of Multidisciplinary Laboratory Science and Medical Biochemistry, Genetic Unit, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Akershus, Norway.
Lin Torstensen BrandalDepartment of Zoonotic, Food- and Waterborne Infections, Norwegian Institute of Public Health, Oslo, Norway.
Bjørn-Arne LindstedtDepartment of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Akershus, Norway.
Silje Bakken JørgensenDepartment of Microbiology and Infection control, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Akershus, Norway.
Colin CharnockDepartment of Life Sciences and Health, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.
Hege Smith TunsjøDepartment of Life Sciences and Health, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway. hetu@oslomet.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1114-0717
OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NOAkershus University Hospital · NONorwegian Institute of Public Health · NONorwegian University of Life Sciences · NO

Funding

Akershus universitetssykehus Stategimidler 2015Norwegian Institute of Public Health 2014Oslo Metropolitan University 2016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The dynamics related to the loss of stx genes from Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli remain unclear. Current diagnostic procedures have shortcomings in the detection and identification of STEC. This is partly owing to the fact that stx genes may be lost during an infection or in the laboratory. The aim of the present study was to provide new insight into in vivo and in vitro stx loss in order to improve diagnostic procedures. Results from the study support the theory that loss of stx is a strain-related phenomenon and not induced by patient factors. It was observed that one strain could lose stx both in vivo and in vitro. Whole genome comparison of stx-positive and stx-negative isolates from the same patient revealed that different genomic rearrangements, such as complete or partial loss of the parent prophage, may be factors in the loss of stx. Of diagnostic interest, it was shown that patients can be co-infected with different E. coli pathotypes. Therefore, identification of eae-positive, but stx-negative isolates should not be interpreted as "Shiga toxin-lost" E. coli without further testing. Growth and recovery of STEC were supported by different selective agar media for different strains, arguing for inclusion of several media in STEC diagnostics.

Indexed as

AdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolCulture MediaDiarrheaEscherichia coli InfectionsFecesFemaleHumansInfantMaleMicrobiological TechniquesMiddle AgedPolymerase Chain ReactionShiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coliCulture MediaShiga ToxinVirulence FactorsEHEC diagnosticsPhage excisionSelective culture mediaSTEC diagnosticsstx-loss

Identifiers

PMID30267169
OpenAlexW2894473855

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.