Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30267142›Full record

ArticleDysphagia2019

James E Jackson, Nigel J Anderson, Maureen Rolfo, Morikatsu Wada, Michal Schneider, Michael Poulsen, Maziar Fahandej, Anna Huynh, Sze Ting Lee, Daryl Lim Joon and 1 more

Open access · greenAbstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Dysphagia, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

James E JacksonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia. jimejackson@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4826-2339
Nigel J AndersonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Maureen RolfoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Morikatsu WadaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Michal SchneiderDepartment of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
Michael PoulsenRadiation Oncology Centres, Gold Coast University Hospital, 1 Hospital Boulevard, Southport, QLD, 4215, Australia.
Maziar FahandejDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Anna HuynhRadiation Oncology Centres, Gold Coast University Hospital, 1 Hospital Boulevard, Southport, QLD, 4215, Australia.
Sze Ting LeeCentre for PET, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Daryl Lim JoonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Vincent KhooDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Olivia Newton John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre, Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia.
Olivia Newton-John Cancer Wellness & Research Centre · AUAustin Health · AUGold Coast Hospital · AUGriffith University · AUMonash University · AUPeter MacCallum Cancer Centre · AURoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBThe University of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the metabolic tumor volume (MTV) of head and neck primary tumors may be a significant prognostic factor for feeding tube (FT) use and FT dependence. Seventy-nine patients with evaluable primary tumors, pre-therapy FDG-PET scans, treated with definitive intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) (± concurrent chemotherapy) for head and neck mucosal cancers were included. MTV was quantified and recorded for the primary lesion using a minimum standardized uptake value (SUV) threshold of 2.0. Patients were recommended prophylactic FT and followed up by a dietician for at least eight weeks of post-radiotherapy. Associations between MTV, dose to swallowing organs at risk, FT use, and FT dependence were analyzed. MTV was positively correlated with gross tumor volume (GTV) (r = 0.7357; p < 0.0001). MTVs larger than 17 cc were associated with higher rates of FT use (87.8% vs. 69.5%, p = 0.0067) and FT dependence at six weeks (76.7% vs. 41.7%, p = 0.0024) and six months (25.0% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.0088). Increasing MTV was associated with increasing mean dose to the oral cavity (p = < 0.0001), tongue base (p = 0.0009), and superior (SPCM) (p = 0.0001) and middle pharyngeal constrictor muscles (MPCM) (p = 0.0005). Increasing MTV was associated with increasing maximum dose to oral cavity (p = 0.0028), tongue base (p = 0.0056), SPCM (p = 0.0037), and MPCM (p = 0.0085). Pre-treatment MTV is a reproducible parameter that can be generated at or prior to a pre-treatment Multidisciplinary Tumor Board and may expedite decisions regarding placement of prophylactic FTs. Prospective evaluation in larger series is required to determine whether MTV is a more useful prognostic variable for FT use than clinical T-classification.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overEnteral NutritionFemaleFluorodeoxyglucose F18Head and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPositron-Emission TomographyPrognosisRadiopharmaceuticalsRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsEnteral nutritionHead & neck neoplasmsPositron-emission tomographyRadiotherapyToxicity

Identifiers

PMID30267142
OpenAlexW2894267867

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.