ArticleJAMA dermatology2018
Association of Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics With Differences in Use of Outpatient Dermatology Services in the United States.
Article in JAMA dermatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Occupational solar exposure and basal cell carcinoma. A review of the epidemiologic literature with meta-analysis focusing on particular methodological aspects.European journal of epidemiology · 2024Pooled it
- Condyloma acuminata management in female patients differs by specialty and sociodemographic factors.JAAD international · 2026Article
- Skin Health Literacy in Ontario Secondary Schools: An Overlooked Opportunity for Preventive Health Education.The Journal of school health · 2026Article
- The Effects of Outreach Initiatives on Equitable Access to Dermatology Services: Single-Center Retrospective Analysis.JMIR dermatology · 2026Article
- Exploring the Social, Emotional, and Physical Consequences of Hidradenitis Suppurativa in Pediatric Patients: A Scoping Review.Pediatric reports · 2026Review
- Mapping melanoma in Hawai'i with inpatient discharge data from 2016 to 2023: Community determinants and anatomic distribution patterns.Cancer epidemiology · 2026Article
- Empowering Rural Adolescents to Build Healthy Skin Habits and Self-Advocacy Through a School-Based Intervention.Cureus · 2026Article
- Article
- Gaps in phototherapy and Mohs surgery access: A cross-sectional survey of dermatology residency programs in the United States.JAAD international · 2026Article
- Article
- Article
- From knowledge gaps to confidence: a pilot study evaluating a multilingual skin cancer educational intervention in underserved Spanish- and Punjabi-speaking communities.International journal of women's dermatology · 2025Article
- Treating Onychomycosis with Efinaconazole: Considerations for Diverse Patient Groups.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Generalized fixed drug eruptions in skin of color.International journal of women's dermatology · 2025Article
- Longitudinal changes in brain asymmetry track lifestyle and disease.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Higher odds of dupilumab prescriptions for Black patients with atopic dermatitis: Results of a retrospective study using DataDerm, the database of the American Academy of Dermatology.Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · 2025Article
- Access to dermatologic care: a comparative analysis of primary and satellite clinics.Archives of dermatological research · 2025Article
- Outpatient Dermatology Productivity Measures by Patient Race, Sex, and Age.JAMA dermatology · 2025Article
- Factors Influencing the Selection of a Physician for Dermatological Consultation in Saudi Arabia: A National Survey.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Knowledge regarding differences in dermatologic care for patients with a broad range of dermatologic conditions is limited. Objective: To elucidate nationwide differences in use of outpatient dermatologic care. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective analysis of nationally representative data from the 2007 to 2015 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) provided by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Health care use outcomes for dermatologic conditions (skin cancers, infections, dermatologic inflammatory conditions/ulcers, and other skin disorders) were examined via multivariable logistic regression analyses of outpatient and office-based dermatologist visit rates accounting for sex, age, race/ethnicity, educational level, income, insurance status, region, self-reported condition, and self-reported health status. Participants were 183 054 MEPS respondents who visited a dermatologist from 2007 to 2015. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome measure was whether the patient received outpatient care for any dermatologic condition (by payment). The secondary outcomes were annual health care use by individuals with dermatologic conditions (including per capita expenditure for the visit). Results: Of 183 054 MEPS respondents (mean [SD] age, 34 [23] years; 52.1% female), 19 561 (10.7%) self-reported a dermatologic condition; 9645 patients had a total of 11 761 outpatient visits to dermatologists. Hispanic (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.55; 95% CI, 0.49-0.61) and black (aOR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.38-0.46) patients were both less likely to receive outpatient care for their dermatologic condition relative to non-Hispanic white patients. Male patients were less likely to receive outpatient dermatologic care than female patients (aOR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.62-0.70), and Midwestern patients were less likely to receive outpatient dermatologic care than Northeastern patients (aOR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.70-0.91). Patients with Medicaid or Medicare coverage (aOR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.68-0.83) and uninsured patients (aOR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.33-0.47) were both less likely to receive outpatient dermatologic care than privately insured patients. Increasing educational level and income were associated with increased odds of receiving outpatient care for the dermatologic condition. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings highlight wide-ranging differences in use of dermatologic care in the United States across various demographic and socioeconomic lines. Results of this study suggest an urgent need to further characterize potential dermatologic health care differences and improve use of outpatient dermatologic care among disadvantaged populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.