Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30267020›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Excitability regulation in the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex during sustained instructed fear responses: a TMS-EEG study.

Gabriel Gonzalez-Escamilla, Venkata C Chirumamilla, Benjamin Meyer, Tamara Bonertz, Sarah von Grotthus, Johannes Vogt, Albrecht Stroh, Johann-Philipp Horstmann, Oliver Tüscher, Raffael Kalisch and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Gabriel Gonzalez-EscamillaSection of Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neurosciences (FTN), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7209-1736
Venkata C ChirumamillaSection of Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neurosciences (FTN), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Benjamin MeyerNeuroimaging Center Mainz, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Tamara BonertzSection of Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neurosciences (FTN), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Sarah von GrotthusSection of Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neurosciences (FTN), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Johannes VogtInstitute for Microscopic Anatomy and Neurobiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Albrecht StrohFocus Program Translational Neurosciences, Institute for Microscopic Anatomy and Neurobiology, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9410-4086
Johann-Philipp HorstmannDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Oliver TüscherDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4023-5301
Raffael KalischNeuroimaging Center Mainz, Focus Program Translational Neuroscience, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Muthuraman MuthuramanSection of Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neurosciences (FTN), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany.
Sergiu GroppaSection of Movement Disorders and Neurostimulation, Department of Neurology, Focus Program Translational Neurosciences (FTN), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131, Mainz, Germany. segroppa@uni-mainz.de.
Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DE

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) CRC-TR-1193
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Threat detection is essential for protecting individuals from adverse situations, in which a network of amygdala, limbic regions and dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (dmPFC) regions are involved in fear processing. Excitability regulation in the dmPFC might be crucial for fear processing, while abnormal patterns could lead to mental illness. Notwithstanding, non-invasive paradigms to measure excitability regulation during fear processing in humans are missing. To address this challenge we adapted an approach for excitability characterization, combining electroencephalography (EEG) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) over the dmPFC during an instructed fear paradigm, to dynamically dissect its role in fear processing. Event-related (ERP) and TMS-evoked potentials (TEP) were analyzed to trace dmPFC excitability. We further linked the excitability regulation patterns to individual MRI-derived gray matter structural integrity of the fear network. Increased cortical excitability was demonstrated to threat (T) processing in comparison to no-threat (NT), reflected by increased amplitude of evoked potentials. Furthermore, TMS at dmPFC enhanced the evoked responses during T processing, while the structural integrity of the dmPFC and amygdala predicted the excitability regulation patterns to fear processing. The dmPFC takes a special role during fear processing by dynamically regulating excitability. The applied paradigm can be used to non-invasively track response abnormalities to threat stimuli in healthy subjects or patients with mental disorders.

Indexed as

Brain MappingElectroencephalographyTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultElectroshockEvoked PotentialsFearFemaleHeart RateHumansMalePrefrontal CortexReaction TimeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30267020
PMCPMC6162240
OpenAlexW2949197928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.