Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30266974›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

Genetic Diversity, Population Structure, and Botanical Variety of 320 Global Peanut Accessions Revealed Through Tunable Genotyping-by-Sequencing.

Zheng Zheng, Ziqi Sun, Yuanjin Fang, Feiyan Qi, Hua Liu, Lijuan Miao, Pei Du, Lei Shi, Wei Gao, Suoyi Han and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Zheng ZhengIndustrial Crops Research Institute, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Oil Crops in Huanghuaihai Plains, Ministry of Agriculture/Henan Provincial Key Laboratory for Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Ziqi SunIndustrial Crops Research Institute, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Oil Crops in Huanghuaihai Plains, Ministry of Agriculture/Henan Provincial Key Laboratory for Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Yuanjin FangIndustrial Crops Research Institute, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Oil Crops in Huanghuaihai Plains, Ministry of Agriculture/Henan Provincial Key Laboratory for Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Feiyan QiIndustrial Crops Research Institute, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Oil Crops in Huanghuaihai Plains, Ministry of Agriculture/Henan Provincial Key Laboratory for Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Hua LiuIndustrial Crops Research Institute, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Oil Crops in Huanghuaihai Plains, Ministry of Agriculture/Henan Provincial Key Laboratory for Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Lijuan MiaoIndustrial Crops Research Institute, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Oil Crops in Huanghuaihai Plains, Ministry of Agriculture/Henan Provincial Key Laboratory for Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Pei DuIndustrial Crops Research Institute, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Oil Crops in Huanghuaihai Plains, Ministry of Agriculture/Henan Provincial Key Laboratory for Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Lei ShiIndustrial Crops Research Institute, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Oil Crops in Huanghuaihai Plains, Ministry of Agriculture/Henan Provincial Key Laboratory for Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Wei GaoIndustrial Crops Research Institute, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Oil Crops in Huanghuaihai Plains, Ministry of Agriculture/Henan Provincial Key Laboratory for Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Suoyi HanIndustrial Crops Research Institute, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Oil Crops in Huanghuaihai Plains, Ministry of Agriculture/Henan Provincial Key Laboratory for Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0982-1281
Wenzhao DongIndustrial Crops Research Institute, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Oil Crops in Huanghuaihai Plains, Ministry of Agriculture/Henan Provincial Key Laboratory for Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Fengshou TangIndustrial Crops Research Institute, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Oil Crops in Huanghuaihai Plains, Ministry of Agriculture/Henan Provincial Key Laboratory for Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Feng ChengInstitute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Science, Beijing, 100081, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2982-9675
Haiyan HuIndustrial Crops Research Institute, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Oil Crops in Huanghuaihai Plains, Ministry of Agriculture/Henan Provincial Key Laboratory for Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Zhengzhou, 450002, China.
Bingyan HuangIndustrial Crops Research Institute, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Oil Crops in Huanghuaihai Plains, Ministry of Agriculture/Henan Provincial Key Laboratory for Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Zhengzhou, 450002, China. huangbingyan@aliyun.com.
Xinyou ZhangIndustrial Crops Research Institute, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Oil Crops in Huanghuaihai Plains, Ministry of Agriculture/Henan Provincial Key Laboratory for Genetic Improvement of Oil Crops, Zhengzhou, 450002, China. haasz@126.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cultivated peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) were classified into six botanical varieties according to the morphological characteristics. However, their genetic evolutionary relationships at the genome-wide level were still unclear. A total of 320 peanut accessions, including four of the six botanical varieties, and 37,128 high-quality single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) detected by tunable genotyping-by-sequencing (tGBS) were used to reveal the evolutionary relationships among different botanical varieties and verify the phenotypic classification. A phylogenetic tree indicated that the tested accessions were grouped into three clusters. Almost all of the peanut accessions in cluster C1 belong to var. fastigiata, and clusters C2 and C3 mainly consisted of accessions from var. vulgaris and subsp. hypogaea, respectively. The results of a principal component analysis were consistent with relationships revealed in the phylogenetic tree. Population structure analysis showed that var. fastigiata and var. vulgaris were not separated when K = 2 (subgroup number), whereas they were clearly divided when K = 3. However, var. hypogaea and var. hirsuta could not be distinguished from each other all the way. The nucleotide diversity (π) value implied that var. vulgaris exhibited the highest genetic diversity (0.048), followed by var. fastigiata (0.035) and subsp. hypogaea (0.012), which is consistent with the result of phylogenetic tree. Moreover, the fixation index (F

Indexed as

Genotyping TechniquesArachisBotanyDNA, PlantGenetic VariationGenome, PlantGenotypePhylogenyPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePrincipal Component AnalysisSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID30266974
PMCPMC6162295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.