Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30266928›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2018

The potential role of sciatic nerve stiffness in the limitation of maximal ankle range of motion.

Ricardo J Andrade, Sandro R Freitas, François Hug, Guillaume Le Sant, Lilian Lacourpaille, Raphäel Gross, Peter McNair, Antoine Nordez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Ricardo J AndradeLaboratory ≪Movement, Interactions, Performance≫ (EA 4334), Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Nantes, Nantes, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5316-7531
Sandro R FreitasUniversidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Motricidade Humana, CIPER, P-1100, Lisbon, Portugal.
François HugLaboratory ≪Movement, Interactions, Performance≫ (EA 4334), Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Nantes, Nantes, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6432-558X
Guillaume Le SantLaboratory ≪Movement, Interactions, Performance≫ (EA 4334), Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Nantes, Nantes, France.
Lilian LacourpailleLaboratory ≪Movement, Interactions, Performance≫ (EA 4334), Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Nantes, Nantes, France.
Raphäel GrossLaboratory ≪Movement, Interactions, Performance≫ (EA 4334), Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Nantes, Nantes, France.
Peter McNairHealth and Rehabilitation Research Institute, Faculty of Health and Environmental Sciences, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand.
Antoine NordezLaboratory ≪Movement, Interactions, Performance≫ (EA 4334), Faculty of Sport Sciences, University of Nantes, Nantes, France. antoine.nordez@univ-nantes.fr.
Nantes Université · FRAuckland University of Technology · NZCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes · FRThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Lisbon · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is a long held belief that maximal joint range of motion (ROM) is restricted by muscle tension. However, it exists indirect evidence suggesting that this assumption may not hold true for some joint configurations where non-muscular structures, such as the peripheral nerves, are stretched. Direct evidences are lacking. This study aimed to determine whether a static stretching aiming to load the sciatic nerve without stretch within plantar flexors is effective to: (i) alter nerve stiffness; and (ii) increase the ankle's maximal ROM. Passive maximal ankle ROM in dorsiflexion was assessed with the hip flexed at 90° (HIP-flexed) or neutral (HIP-neutral, 0°). Sciatic nerve stiffness was estimated using shear wave elastography. Sciatic nerve stretching induced both a 13.3 ± 7.9% (P < 0.001) decrease in the nerve stiffness and a 6.4 ± 2.6° increase in the maximal dorsiflexion ROM assessed in HIP-flexed. In addition, the decrease in sciatic nerve stiffness was significantly correlated with the change in maximal ROM in dorsiflexion (r = -0.571, P = 0.026). These effects occurred in the absence of any change in gastrocnemius medialis and biceps femoris stiffness, and ankle passive torque. These results demonstrate that maximal dorsiflexion ROM can be acutely increased by stretching the sciatic nerve, without altering the muscle stiffness.

Indexed as

Range of Motion, ArticularAdultAnkle JointBiomechanical PhenomenaElasticityElasticity Imaging TechniquesFemaleHumansMaleMuscle, SkeletalSciatic NerveYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID30266928
PMCPMC6162234
OpenAlexW2893715702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.