Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30266653›Full record

ArticleMolecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy2018

Targeting Endothelial Erk1/2-Akt Axis as a Regeneration Strategy to Bypass Fibrosis during Chronic Liver Injury in Mice.

Yuanxiang Lao, Yanyan Li, Ping Zhang, Qianqian Shao, Weiran Lin, Bintao Qiu, Yongzhuang Lv, Lichun Tang, Shishuai Su, Hongyu Zhang and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Yuanxiang LaoInstitute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China; State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing 102206, China.
Yanyan LiSchool of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing 102206, China.
Ping ZhangState Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing 102206, China.
Qianqian ShaoState Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing 102206, China.
Weiran LinState Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing 102206, China.
Bintao QiuState Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing 102206, China.
Yongzhuang LvState Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing 102206, China.
Lichun TangState Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing 102206, China.
Shishuai SuNational Center of Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing 100190, China.
Hongyu ZhangState Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing 102206, China.
Chunyan TianState Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing 102206, China.
Aihua SunState Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing 102206, China.
Handong WeiState Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing 102206, China.
Pumin ZhangState Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing 102206, China.
Yan WuNational Center of Nanoscience and Technology, Beijing 100190, China.
Ying JiangState Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing 102206, China; Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230032, China. Electronic address: jiangying304@hotmail.com.
Fuchu HeInstitute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine, Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China; State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing 102206, China. Electronic address: hefc@bmi.ac.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liver sinusoidal endothelial cells (LSECs) have great capacity for liver regeneration, and this capacity can easily switch to profibrotic phenotype, which is still poorly understood. In this study, we elucidated a potential target in LSECs for regenerative treatment that can bypass fibrosis during chronic liver injury. Proregenerative LSECs can be transformed to profibrotic phenotype after 4 weeks of carbon tetrachloride administration or 10 days of bile duct ligation. This phenotypic alternation of LSECs was mediated by extracellular regulated protein kinases 1 and 2 (Erk1/2)-Akt axis switch in LSECs during chronic liver injury; Erk1/2 was normally associated with maintenance of the LSEC proregenerative phenotype, inhibiting hepatic stellate cell (HSC) activation and promoting tissue repair by enhancing nitric oxide (NO)/reactive oxygen species (ROS) ratio and increasing expression of hepatic growth factor (HGF) and Wingless-type MMTV integration site family member 2 (Wnt2). Alternatively, Akt induced LSEC profibrotic phenotype, which mainly stimulated HSC activation and concomitant senescence by reducing NO/ROS ratio and decreasing HGF/Wnt2 expression. LSEC-targeted adenovirus or drug particle to promote Erk1/2 activity can alleviate liver fibrosis, accelerate fibrosis resolution, and enhance liver regeneration. This study demonstrated that the Erk1/2-Akt axis acted as a switch to regulate the proregenerative and profibrotic phenotypes of LSECs, and targeted therapy promoted liver regeneration while bypassing fibrosis, providing clues for a more effective treatment of liver diseases.

Indexed as

Liver RegenerationSignal TransductionAnimalsBiomarkersChronic DiseaseDisease Models, AnimalEndothelial CellsFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHepatic Stellate CellsHepatocytesLiver CirrhosisLiver DiseasesMiceMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3PhenotypeBiomarkersMapk1 protein, mouseMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-aktTOR Serine-Threonine KinasesAktErk1/2hepatic stellate cellliver fibrosisliver regenerationliver sinusoidal endothelial cell

Identifiers

PMID30266653
PMCPMC6277559

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.