Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30265637›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie2018

High complication rate among patients undergoing appendectomy in Ontario: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

Sunil V Patel, Sulaiman Nanji, Susan B Brogly, Katherine Lajkosz, Patti A Groome, Shaila Merchant

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Risk factors for postoperative morbidity, prolonged length of stay and hospital readmission after appendectomy for acute appendicitis.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2023
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sunil V Patel *From the Department of Surgery, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, Ont. (Patel, Nanji, Brogly, Merchant); the Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Patel, Nanji, Merchant); the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Lajkosz, Groome); and the Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Groome).
Sulaiman Nanji *From the Department of Surgery, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, Ont. (Patel, Nanji, Brogly, Merchant); the Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Patel, Nanji, Merchant); the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Lajkosz, Groome); and the Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Groome).
Susan B Brogly *From the Department of Surgery, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, Ont. (Patel, Nanji, Brogly, Merchant); the Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Patel, Nanji, Merchant); the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Lajkosz, Groome); and the Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Groome).
Katherine Lajkosz *From the Department of Surgery, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, Ont. (Patel, Nanji, Brogly, Merchant); the Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Patel, Nanji, Merchant); the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Lajkosz, Groome); and the Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Groome).
Patti A Groome *From the Department of Surgery, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, Ont. (Patel, Nanji, Brogly, Merchant); the Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Patel, Nanji, Merchant); the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Lajkosz, Groome); and the Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Groome).
Shaila Merchant *From the Department of Surgery, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Kingston, Ont. (Patel, Nanji, Brogly, Merchant); the Faculty of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Patel, Nanji, Merchant); the Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Lajkosz, Groome); and the Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, Ont. (Groome).
Kingston Health Sciences Centre · CAQueen's University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAppendectomy is a common emergency procedure. The risks have been reported in previous studies but often are limited to inpatient complications. The purpose of this study was to describe inpatient and outpatient rates of complications associated with appendectomy in a contemporary population-based cohort and explore factors associated with these complications.

methodsWe conducted a retrospective study using linked data for Ontario within Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences databases. Patients who underwent emergent appendectomy between 2009 and 2014 were included. The primary outcome was a complication (death, readmission, emergency department visit, lengthy [> 7 d] hospital stay, percutaneous abscess drainage, reoperation or 1 of the predefined complication codes) occurring within 30 days of surgery. We used modified Poisson regression to identify predictors of complications.

resultsA total of 50 369 patients underwent emergent appendectomy over the study period, of whom 16 953 (33.7%) had a perforated appendix. Overall, 14 451 patients (28.7%) (8428 [25.2%] in the nonperforated group and 6023 [35.5%] in the perforated group) had at least 1 complication. The most common complication was an emergency department visit (7942 patients [15.8%]), followed by surgical site infection (4792 [9.5%]). Increasing age, female sex, rural residence, perforation status, daytime surgery and open surgical technique were associated with increased risk of complications.

conclusionWe found a higher rate of complications after appendectomy than previously reported. The most common complication was presentation to the emergency department. Our definition of complications is more inclusive than in previous studies and provides a deeper understanding of complications after appendectomy.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory Surgical ProceduresAppendectomyAppendicitisDatabases, FactualDrainageEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansLaparoscopyLength of StayMaleMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID30265637
PMCPMC6281459
OpenAlexW2900485842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.