Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30265355›Full record

ArticleTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene2018

Trachoma prevalence remains below threshold in five districts after stopping mass drug administration: results of five surveillance surveys within a hyperendemic setting in Amhara, Ethiopia.

Scott D Nash, Aisha E P Stewart, Tigist Astale, Eshetu Sata, Mulat Zerihun, Demelash Gessese, Berhanu Melak, Gedefaw Ayenew, Zebene Ayele, Belay Bayissasse and 3 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Can we eradicate trachoma? A survey of stakeholders.The British journal of ophthalmology · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Scott D NashTrachoma Control Program, The Carter Center, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Aisha E P StewartTrachoma Control Program, The Carter Center, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Tigist AstaleTrachoma Control Program, The Carter Center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Eshetu SataTrachoma Control Program, The Carter Center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Mulat ZerihunTrachoma Control Program, The Carter Center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Demelash GesseseTrachoma Control Program, The Carter Center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Berhanu MelakTrachoma Control Program, The Carter Center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Gedefaw AyenewTrachoma Control Program, The Carter Center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Zebene AyeleTrachoma Control Program, The Carter Center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Belay BayissasseTrachoma Control Program, The Carter Center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Melsew ChanyalewHealth Promotion and Disease Prevention Core Process, The Amhara Regional Health Bureau, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia.
Zerihun TadesseTrachoma Control Program, The Carter Center, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
E Kelly CallahanTrachoma Control Program, The Carter Center, Atlanta, GA, USA.
The Carter Center · ETCarter Center · USAmhara Regional Health Bureau · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends conducting trachoma surveillance surveys in districts where the elimination targets have been met and following a minimum 2-year period after cessation of mass drug administration (MDA) in order to determine the sustainability of low trachoma levels. Methods: In 2015, population-based surveillance surveys were conducted in five districts of Amhara, Ethiopia. All five districts had a prior trachomatous inflammation-follicular (TF) prevalence among children 1-9 y of age of <5% determined by an impact survey and had not received MDA for ≥2 y. Surveys included examinations for trachoma clinical signs and conjunctival swabbing to determine Chlamydia trachomatis infection prevalence. Results: Approximately 1000 children 1-9 y of age were examined for TF and 200 children 1-5 y of age were swabbed per district. All five surveillance districts had a TF prevalence of <5% and infection was only detected in one district. The prevalence of trachomatous trichiasis in adults ≥15 y of age was ≥1% in all districts. Conclusions: In a trachoma hyperendemic region, a TF prevalence <5% was successfully maintained in five districts for ≥2 years after stopping MDA. MDA is still not warranted for these districts, however, the S, F and E components of the SAFE strategy should continue.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycinChildChild, PreschoolEthiopiaFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansInfantMaleMass Drug AdministrationPopulation SurveillancePrevalenceTrachomaAnti-Bacterial AgentsAzithromycin

Identifiers

PMID30265355
PMCPMC6255692
OpenAlexW2892982753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.