Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30265328›Full record

ArticleNeuro-oncology2019

Outcomes following stereotactic radiosurgery for small to medium-sized brain metastases are exceptionally dependent upon tumor size and prescribed dose.

Fabio Y Moraes, Jeff Winter, Eshetu G Atenafu, Archya Dasgupta, Hamid Raziee, Catherine Coolens, Barbara-Ann Millar, Normand Laperriere, Maitry Patel, Mark Bernstein and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuro-oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Sensitizing brain metastases to stereotactic radiosurgery using hyperbaric oxygen: A proof-of-principle study.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Fabio Y MoraesDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jeff WinterDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Eshetu G AtenafuDepartment of Biostatistics, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Archya DasguptaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Hamid RazieeDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Catherine CoolensDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Barbara-Ann MillarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Normand LaperriereDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Maitry PatelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Mark BernsteinDivision of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Paul KongkhamDivision of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Gelareh ZadehDivision of Neurosurgery, Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Tatiana ConradDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Caroline Chung
Alejandro BerlinDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
David B ShultzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University Health Network · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAt our institution, we have historically treated brain metastasis (BM) ≤2 cm in eloquent brain with a radiosurgery (SRS) lower prescription dose (PD) to reduce the risk of radionecrosis (RN). We sought to evaluate the impact of this practice on outcomes.

methodsWe analyzed a prospective registry of BM patients treated with SRS between 2008 and 2017. Incidences of local failure (LF) and RN were determined and Cox regression was performed for univariate and multivariate analyses (MVAs).

resultsWe evaluated 1533 BM ≤2 cm. Median radiographic follow-up post SRS was 12.7 months (1.4-100). Overall, the 2-year incidence of LF was lower for BM treated with PD ≥21 Gy (9.3%) compared with PD ≤15 Gy (19.5%) (sub-hazard ratio, 2.3; 95% CI: 1.4-3.7; P = 0.0006). The 2-year incidence of RN was not significantly higher for the group treated with PD ≥21 Gy (9.5%) compared with the PD ≤15 Gy group (7.5%) (P = 0.16). MVA demonstrated that PD (≤15 Gy) and tumor size (>1 cm) were significantly correlated (P < 0.05) with higher rates of LF and RN, respectively. For tumors ≤1 cm, when comparing PD ≤15 Gy with ≥21 Gy, the risks of LF and RN are equivalent. However, for lesions >1 cm, PD ≥21 Gy is associated with a lower incidence of LF without significantly increasing the risk of RN.

conclusionOur results indicate that rates of LF or RN following SRS for BM are strongly correlated with size and PD. Based on our results, we now, depending upon the clinical context, consider increasing PD to 21 Gy for BM in eloquent brain, excluding the brainstem.

Indexed as

Tumor BurdenAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrain NeoplasmsDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasmsPrognosisProspective StudiesRadiosurgerybrain metastasesdose escalationmelanomanon–small cell lung cancerradiosurgery

Identifiers

PMID30265328
PMCPMC6374761
OpenAlexW2894323082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.