Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30265060›Full record

ArticleExperimental and clinical psychopharmacology2019

Genetic influences on delayed reward discounting: A genome-wide prioritized subset approach.

James MacKillop, Joshua C Gray, Jessica Weafer, Sandra Sanchez-Roige, Abraham A Palmer, Harriet de Wit

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Delay discounting of different outcomes: Review and theory.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. The Genoeconomics of Impulsive Intertemporal Choice: A Critical Review.Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

James MacKillopPeter Boris Centre for Addictions Research, McMaster University/St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton.
Joshua C GrayDepartment of Psychology, University of Georgia.
Jessica WeaferDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago.
Sandra Sanchez-RoigeDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego.
Abraham A PalmerDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego.
Harriet de WitDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago.
University of California, San Diego · USUniversity of Chicago · USMcMaster University · CAUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

The genetic basis of impulsive behavior in humansR01DA032015 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI DE WIT, HARRIET · 2011 to 2015
$2.4M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA032015NIH HHSPeter Boris Chair in Addictions Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Delayed reward discounting (DRD) is a behavioral economic measure of impulsivity that has been consistently associated with addiction. It has also been identified as a promising addiction endophenotype, linking specific sources of genetic variation to individual risk. A challenge in the studies to date is that levels of DRD are often confounded with prior drug use, and previous studies have also had limited genomic scope. The current investigation sought to address these issues by studying DRD in healthy young adults with low levels of substance use (N = 986; 62% female, 100% European ancestry) and investigating genetic variation genome-wide. The genome-wide approach used a prioritized subset design, organizing the tests into theoretically and empirically informed categories and apportioning power accordingly. Three subsets were used: (a) a priori loci implicated by previous studies; (b) high-value addiction (HVA) markers from the recently developed SmokeScreen array; and (c) an atheoretical genome-wide scan. Among a priori loci, a nominally significant association was present between DRD and rs521674 in ADRA2A. No significant HVA loci were detected. One statistically significant genome-wide association was detected (rs13395777, p = 2.8 × 10-8), albeit in an intergenic region of unknown function. These findings are generally not supportive of the previous candidate gene studies and suggest that DRD has a complex genetic architecture that will require considerably larger samples to identify genetic associations more definitively. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Indexed as

Behavior, AddictiveDelay DiscountingRewardSubstance-Related DisordersAddiction MedicineEconomics, BehavioralFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansImpulsive BehaviorMalePolymorphism, Single NucleotideReceptors, Adrenergic, alpha-2Young AdultADRA2A protein, humanReceptors, Adrenergic, alpha-2

Identifiers

PMID30265060
PMCPMC6908809
OpenAlexW2893700263

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.