ArticleThoracic cancer2018
Indocyanine green fluorescence/thermography evaluation of intercostal muscle flap vascularization.
Article in Thoracic cancer, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intrathoracic retention time of pericardial fat pads without pedicle in bronchial stump coverage: insights from a retrospective study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
- Advantages and rational application of indocyanine green fluorescence in pulmonary nodule surgery: a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2024Review
- A case of laparoscopic sigmoidectomy using thermography for colonic blood flow assessment.Surgical case reports · 2023Article
- The technique of stump closure has no impact on post-pneumonectomy bronchopleural fistula in the non-small cell lung cancer-a cross-sectional study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2022Article
- Changes in pedicle pericardial fat tissue around the anastomotic site after tracheobronchoplasty.Surgery today · 2022Article
- The Role of ICG Angiography in Decision Making About Skin-Sparing in Pediatric Acute Trauma.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDuring anatomical lung resection in high-risk patients, the bronchial stump is covered with tissue flaps (e.g. pericardial fat tissue and intercostal muscle) to prevent bronchopleural fistula development. This is vital for reliable reinforcement of the bronchial stump. We evaluated the blood supply of the flap using indocyanine green fluorescence (ICG-FL) and thermography intraoperatively in 27 patients at high risk for developing a bronchopleural fistula.
methodsBefore reinforcing the stump with a flap, the fluorescence agent was intravenously injected and the blood supply was evaluated. The surface temperature of the flap was measured with thermography. The two modalities were then compared.
resultsICG-FL intensity and surface temperature on the distal compared to the proximal side of the flap decreased by 32.6 ± 29.4% (P < 0.0001) and 3.5 ± 2.0°C (P < 0.0001), respectively. In patients with a higher ICG-FL intensity value at the tip than the median, the surface temperature at the tip decreased by 2.7 ± 1.7°C compared to the proximal side. In patients with a lower ICG-FL value at the tip, the surface temperature decreased by 4.6 ± 1.7°C (P = 0.0574). The bronchial stump reinforced the part of the flap with adequate blood supply; none of the patients developed a bronchopleural fistula.
conclusionsICG-FL confirmed variation in the blood supply of the intercostal muscle flap, even if prepared using the same surgical procedure. Thermography analysis tends to correlate with the fluorescence method, but may be influenced by the state of flap preservation during surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.