Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30264901›Full record

ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2018

Blood eosinophilia, use of inhaled corticosteroids, and risk of COPD exacerbations and mortality.

Olorunfemi A Oshagbemi, Frits M E Franssen, Dionne C W Braeken, Yvonne Henskens, Emiel F M Wouters, Anke-Hilse Maitland-van der Zee, Andrea M Burden, Frank de Vries

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Clinical Predictors of High Blood Eosinophils in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Olorunfemi A OshagbemiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-0653-0443
Frits M E FranssenCIRO, Horn, the Netherlands.
Dionne C W BraekenDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Yvonne HenskensDepartment of Clinical Chemistry, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Emiel F M WoutersCIRO, Horn, the Netherlands.
Anke-Hilse Maitland-van der ZeeDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0414-3442
Andrea M BurdenDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Frank de VriesDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLAmsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIt remains unclear whether eosinophilia is useful for in guiding inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. The goal of this study is to evaluate the risk of acute exacerbations, COPD-related hospitalisations/accident and emergency visits, and all-cause mortality with various levels of eosinophil counts among COPD patients using ICS.

methodsA cohort study was conducted using the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink. Patients were aged 40+ and had COPD (n = 32 693). Current users of ICS were stratified by relative and absolute eosinophil counts to determine the risk of outcomes with blood eosiniphilia using Cox regression analysis.

resultsAmong COPD patients, current use of ICS was not associated with a reduced risk of acute COPD exacerbations, COPD-related hospitalisations/accident and emergency visits, and all-cause mortality. Stratification of ICS use by absolute or relative eosinophil counts did not result in significant differences in risk of COPD exacerbations or hospitalisations/accident and emergency visits. However, all-cause mortality was reduced by 12% to 24% among patients with eosinophilia.

conclusionsCOPD-related acute exacerbations or hospitalisations/accident and emergency visits were not reduced with eosinophilia among users of ICS with COPD. However, all-cause mortality was reduced by 12% to 24%. These findings are potentially important and require further evaluation in prospective studies.

Indexed as

Administration, InhalationAdultAgedAged, 80 and overDisease ProgressionDose-Response Relationship, DrugEmergency Service, HospitalEosinophiliaFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlucocorticoidsHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesGlucocorticoidschronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseeosinophilsexacerbationsinhaled corticosteroidspharmacoepidemiology

Identifiers

PMID30264901
PMCPMC6282838
OpenAlexW2893748468

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.