ReviewXenotransplantation2018
Possible risks posed by single-stranded DNA viruses of pigs associated with xenotransplantation.
Review in Xenotransplantation, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comprehensive Protocols for Detecting Xenotransplantation-Relevant Viruses.Methods and protocols · 2025Article
- Current Insights into Porcine Bocavirus (PBoV) and Its Impact on the Economy and Public Health.Veterinary sciences · 2024Review
- Narrative Review of the Safety of Using Pigs for Xenotransplantation: Characteristics and Diagnostic Methods of Vertical Transmissible Viruses.Biomedicines · 2024Review
- Screening for Viruses in Indigenous Greek Black Pigs.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- The prevention strategies of swine viruses related to xenotransplantation.Virology journal · 2023Review
- Virus Safety of Xenotransplantation.Viruses · 2022Review
- Ungulate bocaparvovirus 4 and rodent bocavirus are different genotypes of the same species of virus.Virologica Sinica · 2022Article
- Porcine Bocavirus: A 10-Year History since Its Discovery.Virologica Sinica · 2021Review
- Risk Assessment for Use of a Porcine Circovirus-Contaminated Reagent in a Barrier Maintained Rodent Colony.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2020Article
- The intestinal virome in children with cystic fibrosis differs from healthy controls.PloS one · 2020Article
- Use of a Novel Enhanced DNA Vaccine Vector for Preclinical Virus Vaccine Investigation.Vaccines · 2019Review
- Possible risks posed by single-stranded DNA viruses of pigs associated with xenotransplantation.Xenotransplantation · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Routine large-scale xenotransplantation from pigs to humans is getting closer to clinical reality owing to several state-of-the-art technologies, especially the ability to rapidly engineer genetically defined pigs. However, using pig organs in humans poses risks including unwanted cross-species transfer of viruses and adaption of these pig viruses to the human organ recipient. Recent developments in the field of virology, including the advent of metagenomic techniques to characterize entire viromes, have led to the identification of a plethora of viruses in many niches. Single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) viruses are the largest group prevalent in virome studies in mammals. Specifically, the ssDNA viral genomes are characterized by a high rate of nucleotide substitution, which confers a proclivity to adapt to new hosts and cross-species barriers. Pig-associated ssDNA viruses include torque teno sus viruses (TTSuV) in the Anelloviridae family, porcine parvoviruses (PPV), and porcine bocaviruses (PBoV) both in the family of Parvoviridae, and porcine circoviruses (PCV) in the Circoviridae family, some of which have been confirmed to be pathogenic to pigs. The risks of these viruses for the human recipient during xenotransplantation procedures are relatively unknown. Based on the scant knowledge available on the prevalence, predilection, and pathogenicity of pig-associated ssDNA viruses, careful screening and monitoring are required. In the case of positive identification, risk assessments and strategies to eliminate these viruses in xenotransplantation pig stock may be needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.