Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30264833›Full record

ArticleFaraday discussions2018

Nanoscale electrochemical kinetics & dynamics: the challenges and opportunities of single-entity measurements.

M A Edwards, D A Robinson, H Ren, C G Cheyne, C S Tan, H S White

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Faraday discussions, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Electrodeposition of Zn nanoparticlesNanoscale advances · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Stochasticity in Single-Entity Electrochemistry.Current opinion in electrochemistry · 2021
    Article
  7. Nanoelectrochemistry in the study of single-cell signaling.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2020
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Bioelectrical understanding and engineering of cell biology.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Perspective and Prospectus on Single-Entity Electrochemistry.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

M A EdwardsDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, 315 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112-0850, USA. white@chem.utah.edu.
D A Robinson
H Ren
C G Cheyne
C S Tan
H S White

Funding

Nanopore Detection of DNA DamageR01GM093099 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI BURROWS, CYNTHIA J · 2011 to 2021
$3.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM093099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of nanoscale electrochemistry since the mid-1980s has been predominately coupled with steady-state voltammetric (i-E) methods. This research has been driven by the desire to understand the mechanisms of very fast electrochemical reactions, by electroanalytical measurements in small volumes and unusual media, including in vivo measurements, and by research on correlating electrocatalytic activity, e.g., O2 reduction reaction, with nanoparticle size and structure. Exploration of the behavior of nanoelectrochemical structures (nanoelectrodes, nanoparticles, nanogap cells, etc.) of a characteristic dimension λ using steady-state i-E methods generally relies on the well-known relationship, λ2 ∼ Dt, which relates diffusional lengths to time, t, through the coefficient, D. Decreasing λ, by performing measurements at a nanometric length scales, results in a decrease in the effective timescale of the measurement, and provides a direct means to probe the kinetics of steps associated with very rapid electrochemical reactions. For instance, steady-state voltammetry using a nanogap twin-electrode cell of characteristic width, λ ∼ 10 nm, allows investigations of events occurring at timescales on the order of ∼100 ns. Among many other advantages, decreasing λ also increases spatial resolution in electrochemical imaging, e.g., in scanning electrochemical microscopy, and allows probing of the electric double layer. This Introductory Lecture traces the evolution and driving forces behind the "λ2 ∼ Dt" steady-state approach to nanoscale electrochemistry, beginning in the late 1950s with the introduction of the rotating ring-disk electrode and twin-electrode thin-layer cells, and evolving to current-day investigations using nanoelectrodes, scanning nanocells for imaging, nanopores, and nanoparticles. The recent focus on so-called "single-entity" electrochemistry, in which individual and very short redox events are probed, is a significant departure from the steady-state approach, but provides new opportunities to probe reaction dynamics. The stochastic nature of very fast single-entity events challenges current electrochemical methods and modern electronics, as illustrated using recent experiments from the authors' laboratory.

Indexed as

DiffusionDNAElectrochemical TechniquesEquipment DesignKineticsMicroelectrodesMicroscopy, Scanning TunnelingModels, MolecularNanoparticlesNanoporesNanotechnologyOxidation-ReductionStochastic ProcessesDNA

Identifiers

PMID30264833
PMCPMC6261779

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.