ArticleFaraday discussions2018
Nanoscale electrochemical kinetics & dynamics: the challenges and opportunities of single-entity measurements.
Article in Faraday discussions, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Electrodeposition of Zn nanoparticlesNanoscale advances · 2026Article
- A Look inside a Flexible Open-Source Scanning Electrochemical Probe Microscope.ACS electrochemistry · 2026Article
- Electrochemical correlative microscopy: Discovering insights into structure-reactivity relationships for electrochemical energy conversion and storage.Current opinion in electrochemistry · 2025Article
- The role of applied potential on particle sizing precision in single-entity blocking electrochemistry.Electrochimica acta · 2023Article
- Seeing Is Not Believing: Filtering Effects on Random Nature in Electrochemical Measurements of Single-Entity Collision.ACS measurement science au · 2022Article
- Stochasticity in Single-Entity Electrochemistry.Current opinion in electrochemistry · 2021Article
- Nanoelectrochemistry in the study of single-cell signaling.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2020Review
- Exploring dynamic interactions of single nanoparticles at interfaces for surface-confined electrochemical behavior and size measurement.Nature communications · 2020Article
- Bioelectrical understanding and engineering of cell biology.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2020Article
- Single Entity Electrochemistry in Nanopore Electrode Arrays: Ion Transport Meets Electron Transfer in Confined Geometries.Accounts of chemical research · 2020Article
- Theoretical modeling of electrochemical nucleation and growth of a single metal nanocluster on a nanoelectrode.RSC advances · 2020Article
- Micro/Nano Electrode Array Sensors: Advances in Fabrication and Emerging Applications in Bioanalysis.Frontiers in chemistry · 2020Review
- Perspective and Prospectus on Single-Entity Electrochemistry.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The development of nanoscale electrochemistry since the mid-1980s has been predominately coupled with steady-state voltammetric (i-E) methods. This research has been driven by the desire to understand the mechanisms of very fast electrochemical reactions, by electroanalytical measurements in small volumes and unusual media, including in vivo measurements, and by research on correlating electrocatalytic activity, e.g., O2 reduction reaction, with nanoparticle size and structure. Exploration of the behavior of nanoelectrochemical structures (nanoelectrodes, nanoparticles, nanogap cells, etc.) of a characteristic dimension λ using steady-state i-E methods generally relies on the well-known relationship, λ2 ∼ Dt, which relates diffusional lengths to time, t, through the coefficient, D. Decreasing λ, by performing measurements at a nanometric length scales, results in a decrease in the effective timescale of the measurement, and provides a direct means to probe the kinetics of steps associated with very rapid electrochemical reactions. For instance, steady-state voltammetry using a nanogap twin-electrode cell of characteristic width, λ ∼ 10 nm, allows investigations of events occurring at timescales on the order of ∼100 ns. Among many other advantages, decreasing λ also increases spatial resolution in electrochemical imaging, e.g., in scanning electrochemical microscopy, and allows probing of the electric double layer. This Introductory Lecture traces the evolution and driving forces behind the "λ2 ∼ Dt" steady-state approach to nanoscale electrochemistry, beginning in the late 1950s with the introduction of the rotating ring-disk electrode and twin-electrode thin-layer cells, and evolving to current-day investigations using nanoelectrodes, scanning nanocells for imaging, nanopores, and nanoparticles. The recent focus on so-called "single-entity" electrochemistry, in which individual and very short redox events are probed, is a significant departure from the steady-state approach, but provides new opportunities to probe reaction dynamics. The stochastic nature of very fast single-entity events challenges current electrochemical methods and modern electronics, as illustrated using recent experiments from the authors' laboratory.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.