Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30264478›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2018

Analysis of solid tumor mutation profiles in liquid biopsy.

Sai A Balaji, Ashwini Shanmugam, Anuradha Chougule, Srikant Sridharan, Kumar Prabhash, Anuradha Arya, Aditya Chaubey, Arun Hariharan, Pandurang Kolekar, Manimala Sen and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Sai A BalajiStrand Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Ashwini ShanmugamStrand Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Anuradha ChouguleTata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Srikant SridharanStrand Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Kumar PrabhashTata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Anuradha AryaMazumdar Shaw Center for Translational Research, Mazumdar Shaw Medical Foundation, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Aditya ChaubeyMazumdar Shaw Center for Translational Research, Mazumdar Shaw Medical Foundation, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Arun HariharanStrand Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Pandurang KolekarStrand Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Manimala SenStrand Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Aarthi RavichandranStrand Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Shanmukh KatragaddaStrand Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Satish SankaranStrand Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Saurabh BhargavaMazumdar Shaw Medical Center, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Prashanth KulkarniMazumdar Shaw Medical Center, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Suchitra RaoMazumdar Shaw Medical Center, Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Chinnababu SunkavalliApollo Cancer Specialty Hospitals, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Shripad BanavaliTata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Amit JoshiTata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Vanita NoronhaTata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Amit DuttAdvanced Centre for Treatment, Research and Education in Cancer, Tata Memorial Centre, Kharghar, Raigad, Maharashtra, India.
Urvashi BahadurStrand Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Ramesh HariharanStrand Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Vamsi VeeramachaneniStrand Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Karnataka, India.
Vaijayanti GuptaStrand Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Karnataka, India.ORCID 0000-0001-8716-5307

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Liquid biopsy is increasingly gaining traction as an alternative to invasive solid tumor biopsies for prognosis, treatment decisions, and disease monitoring. Matched tumor-plasma samples were collected from 180 patients across different cancers with >90% of the samples below Stage IIIB. Tumors were profiled using next-generation sequencing (NGS) or quantitative PCR (qPCR), and the mutation status was queried in the matched plasma using digital platforms such as droplet digital PCR (ddCPR) or NGS for concordance. Tumor-plasma concordance of 82% and 32% was observed in advanced (Stage IIB and above) and early (Stage I to Stage IIA) stage samples, respectively. Interestingly, the overall survival outcomes correlated to presurgical/at-biopsy ctDNA levels. Baseline ctDNA stratified patients into three categories: (a) high ctDNA correlated with poor survival outcome, (b) undetectable ctDNA with good outcome, and (c) low ctDNA whose outcome was ambiguous. ctDNA could be a powerful tool for therapy decisions and patient management in a large number of cancers across a variety of stages.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNAAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLiquid BiopsyMaleMiddle AgedMutationNeoplasmsPrognosisProportional Hazards ModelsYoung AdultCirculating Tumor DNAconcordancectDNAmonitoringprognosissurvival outcome

Identifiers

PMID30264478
PMCPMC6246960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.