ArticleDer Anaesthesist2018
[Hemodynamic target variables in the intensive care unit].
Article in Der Anaesthesist, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- [Hemodynamic monitoring- (NOT) a nursing task?!]Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2024Article
- [Perioperative optimization using hemodynamically focused echocardiography in high-risk patients-A practice guide].Der Anaesthesist · 2021Review
- Perioperative echocardiography-guided hemodynamic therapy in high-risk patients: a practical expert approach of hemodynamically focused echocardiography.Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2021Review
- [Optimal cardiovascular medication - what, when and how?]Der Anaesthesist · 2020Article
- [72-year-old male with arrhythmia during surgery : Preparation for the medical specialist examination: Part 45].Der Anaesthesist · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite broad availability, extended hemodynamic monitoring is used in practice only in the minority of critical care patients. Pathophysiological reasoning suggests that systemic perfusion pressure (and thereby arterial as well as central venous pressure), cardiac stroke volume, and the systemic oxygen balance are key variables in maintaining adequate organ perfusion. In line with these assumptions, several studies support that a goal-directed optimization of these hemodynamic variables leads to a reduction in morbidity and mortality. The appropriate monitoring modality should be selected following echocardiographic evaluation of biventricular function. Ideally, high-risk patients with limited right ventricular function should be monitored with a pulmonary artery catheter. In patients with preserved right ventricular function, transpulmonary thermodilution with special consideration of extravascular lung water seems to be sufficient to guide hemodynamic therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.