Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30264343›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2019

Biodegradation of phenol by Acinetobacter tandoii isolated from the gut of the termite.

Seth Van Dexter, Raj Boopathy

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Genome sequences ofMicrobiology resource announcements · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Phenol Removal Capacity of the Common Duckweed (Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Characterization of a pH-Tolerant StrainFrontiers in microbiology · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Seth Van DexterDepartment of Biological Sciences, Nicholls State University, Thibodaux, LA, 70310, USA.
Raj BoopathyDepartment of Biological Sciences, Nicholls State University, Thibodaux, LA, 70310, USA. Ramaraj.Boopathy@nicholls.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The diet of wood-feeding termites (WFT) consists of cellulose, hemicellulose, and lignin. Cellulose and hemicellulose are utilized by symbiotic protozoa as a carbon source. Protozoa produce acetate, which is the carbon source of the termite. Recently, the mechanisms by which lignin is modified by termites have been reported. Lignin is broken down into its phenylpropanoid monomers and phenolic compounds. Bacteria from WFT gut capable of degrading lignin metabolic products are potentially valuable for bioremediation and biofuel production. A bacterium was isolated from the gut of the WFT and identified as Acinetobacter tandoii. This bacterium was capable of utilizing phenol as the sole carbon source and was able to completely degrade phenol at the concentration of 280 mg/L. A. tandoii degraded phenol via the ortho and β-ketoadipase pathway. This bacterium is a known phenol degrader, but to our knowledge, this is the first time it was isolated and tested for phenol-degrading ability from termites.

Indexed as

Biodegradation, EnvironmentalAcinetobacterAnimalsBacteriaBiofuelsCelluloseEnvironmental PollutantsIsopteraLigninPhenolPhenolsPolysaccharidesSymbiosisWoodBiofuelsCelluloseEnvironmental PollutantshemicelluloseLigninPhenolPhenolsPolysaccharidesAcinetobacterBiodegradationPhenolWood-feeding termiteβ-ketoadipase pathway

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.