Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30264207›Full record

ArticleAIDS and behavior2019

Differences in Medical Mistrust Between Black and White Women: Implications for Patient-Provider Communication About PrEP.

Mehrit Tekeste, Shawnika Hull, John F Dovidio, Cara B Safon, Oni Blackstock, Tamara Taggart, Trace S Kershaw, Clair Kaplan, Abigail Caldwell, Susan B Lane and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in AIDS and behavior, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05587517 (A Clinical Trial of Interventions to Support Family Surrogates of Critically Ill Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 106 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05587517 phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Clinical Trial of Interventions to Support Family Surrogates of Critically Ill Patients

TypeinterventionalSponsorWeill Medical College of Cornell UniversityRan2022 to 2027Enrolled172ConditionsGrief, Trauma, Psychotherapy, Critical CareArmsEMPOWER, Supportive Conversation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Mehrit TekesteDepartment of Psychology, George Washington University, 2125 G Street NW, Washington, DC, 20052, USA. mtekeste@gwu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2222-2814
Shawnika HullMilken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
John F DovidioDepartment of Psychology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Cara B SafonYale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Oni BlackstockNew York City Department of Health & Mental Hygiene, New York, NY, USA.
Tamara TaggartMilken Institute School of Public Health, George Washington University, Washington, DC, USA.
Trace S KershawYale School of Public Health, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA.
Clair KaplanPlanned Parenthood of Southern New England, New Haven, CT, USA.
Abigail CaldwellPlanned Parenthood of Southern New England, New Haven, CT, USA.
Susan B LanePlanned Parenthood of Southern New England, New Haven, CT, USA.
Sarah K CalabreseDepartment of Psychology, George Washington University, 2125 G Street NW, Washington, DC, 20052, USA.

Funding

Using Coincidence Analysis to Investigate Factors Affecting PrEP Initiation and Continuation in Southern ending the Epidemic CountiesP30MH062294 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John Edward Pachankis · 2001 to 2026
$48.5M
UCLA Implementation Science and Substance Use Research and Education (ISSURE) ProgramR25DA035692 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI TIMOTHY W FONG, GAIL E. WYATT · 2013 to 2026
$3.9M
SUICIDE RISK AND PROTECTIVE FACTORS IN BLACK ADOLESCENTSK01MH002003 · NIMH · GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MOLOCK, SHERRY DAVIS · 2001 to 2005
$726k
Intervention to Promote PrEP Awareness and Equitable Prescription among ProvidersK01MH103080 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CALABRESE, SARAH K. · 2014 to 2017
$634k
NIDA NIH HHS R25 DA035692NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH002003NIMH NIH HHS K01 MH103080NIMH NIH HHS P30 MH062294NIMH NIH HHS P30-MH062294
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is an effective biomedical HIV prevention method. PrEP uptake has been persistently low among US women, particularly Black women, who account for 61% of new HIV diagnoses among women. Further understanding of barriers to Black women accessing PrEP is needed. This 2017 cross-sectional survey study explored race-based differences in PrEP interest and intention among women and the indirect association between race and comfort discussing PrEP with a healthcare provider through medical mistrust. The sample consisted of 501 adult women (241 Black; 260 White) who were HIV-negative, PrEP-inexperienced, and heterosexually active. Black women reported greater PrEP interest and intention than White women. However, Black women expressed higher levels of medical mistrust, which, in turn, was associated with lower comfort discussing PrEP with a provider. Medical mistrust may operate as a unique barrier to PrEP access among Black women who are interested in and could benefit from PrEP.

Indexed as

Pre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdultBlack or African AmericanCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PersonnelHIV InfectionsHumansIntentionMiddle AgedTrustWhite PeopleBlack/African AmericanHIV/AIDSMedical mistrustPre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP)Women

Identifiers

PMID30264207
PMCPMC7690288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.