Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30264195›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2018

Assessing a ban on the use of UV tanning devices among adolescents in Ontario, Canada: first-year results.

Victoria Nadalin, Loraine D Marrett, Caroline Cawley, John Atkinson, Thomas Tenkate, Jennifer McWhirter, Cheryl F Rosen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Assessing the content and comprehensiveness of provincial and territorial indoor tanning legislation in Canada.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Victoria NadalinCancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada.
Loraine D MarrettCancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada. Loraine.marrett@cancercare.on.ca.
Caroline CawleyCancer Care Ontario, Toronto, Canada.
John AtkinsonCanadian Cancer Society, Toronto, Canada.
Thomas TenkateRyerson University, Toronto, Canada.
Jennifer McWhirterUniversity of Guelph, Guelph, Canada.
Cheryl F RosenUniversity Health Network and University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Cancer Care Ontario · CACanadian Cancer Society · CAToronto Metropolitan University · CAUniversity of Guelph · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo describe the effect of the first year of a ban on UV tanning device (beds, lamps) use among those under 18 years of age in Ontario, Canada.

methodsOnline questionnaires were completed by adolescents in grades 7 to 12, aged less than 18 years: one when the ban was enacted (May 2014) and a second a year later (May 2015). Questionnaires asked grade, age, sex, and about use of UV tanning devices in the previous year. Recent users were asked about length, frequency, and location of use; service refusals and reasons; awareness of signs/warning labels; and use of eye protection. Weighted estimates and confidence intervals were generated.

resultsThere were 1561 participants in 2014 and 2305 in 2015. No reduction was observed in UV tanning device use (6.9% vs. 7.9%) in the 12 months preceding the survey. In 2015, most respondents used UV tanning devices in beauty establishments, which was a shift away from gyms and fitness centres as seen in 2014. Non-significant increases occurred in the proportions noticing warning signs/labels (57% vs. 71%), required to wear eye protection (92% vs. 99%), and refused service (17% vs. 21%). Most adolescents who were refused service did not use tanning devices that year (72%).

conclusionUse did not change in the year following enactment of a ban on UV tanning devices among youth in Ontario. The ban did lead to improvements in service refusal, awareness of warning signage, and use of eye protection. As service refusal deterred future use, enhanced enforcement is important.

Indexed as

AdolescentFemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleOntarioSkin NeoplasmsSunbathingSurveys and QuestionnairesUltraviolet RaysAdolescentGovernment legislationTanning bedTanning lampUV radiation

Identifiers

PMID30264195
PMCPMC6964552
OpenAlexW2894355231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.