Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30264164›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2019

A prospective, interventional, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Bacillus coagulans LBSC in the treatment of acute diarrhea with abdominal discomfort.

Chiranjit Maity, Anil Kumar Gupta

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Probiotics for treating acute infectious diarrhoea.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. The probioticGut microbes
    Trial
  7. Clinical and In Vitro Safety ofMicroorganisms · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The ProbioticMicroorganisms · 2023
    Article
  11. The role ofFrontiers in nutrition · 2023
    Article
  12. Preclinical Safety Assessment ofMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Isolation of food-derived bacteria inducing interleukin-22 in B cells.Bioscience of microbiota, food and health · 2020
    Article
  16. Efficacy and Safety ofGlobal advances in integrative medicine and health
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Chiranjit MaityProbiotics Laboratory, Advanced Enzyme Technologies Ltd., 5th Floor, A-Wing, Sun Magnetica, LIC Service Road, Louiswadi, Thane (W), Maharashtra, 400 604, India. chiranjit@advancedenzymes.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9400-3947
Anil Kumar GuptaProbiotics Laboratory, Advanced Enzyme Technologies Ltd., 5th Floor, A-Wing, Sun Magnetica, LIC Service Road, Louiswadi, Thane (W), Maharashtra, 400 604, India.
Sun Pharma Advanced Research (India) · IN

Funding

Advanced Enzyme Technologies Ltd. NTRC/WO No. 2142601
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeIncreasing resistance towards antibiotics has augmented the use of probiotics for the treatment of diarrhea and associated symptoms. Probiotics are active microorganisms which exert some health benefits when consumed in the right amount. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted on 60 "intention to treat" subjects to evaluate the safety and efficacy of probiotic preparation Lactic Acid Bacillus (LAB containing active ingredient Bacillus coagulans strain LBSC) for the treatment of acute diarrhea with abdominal discomfort.

methodsThe Test-A arm (n = 30) was on B. coagulans LBSC [2 billion/g] and Placebo-B arm (n = 30) was on the carrier. The primary outcomes were the time to last unformed stool (TTLUS), number of unformed stools, change in severity of abdominal pain, time to complete resolution of abdominal discomfort, complete remission of diarrhea, and quality of life (QoL). The secondary outcomes were physical examination and vitals, hematological analysis, and assessment of reported adverse events (AEs) or serious adverse events (SAEs).

resultsTrial data showed that the LAB was well-tolerated by participants at the dose provided. The LAB was effective in recovering from acute diarrhea with abdominal pain and discomforts and exhibited improved cluster of QoL. No AEs or SAEs were reported during the trial.

conclusionsIt is evident that the test drug, i.e., LAB (B. coagulans strain LBSC) is safe and effective for improving the pathophysiological conditions related to acute diarrhea and abdominal discomfort evaluated through stage-II clinical trial.

Indexed as

Bacillus coagulansAbdominal PainAdolescentAdultDiarrheaDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedProbioticsProspective StudiesQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAbdominal painBacillus coagulansBristol stool scaleDiarrheaQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID30264164
OpenAlexW2892536357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.