Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30263971›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2018

In vitro response of dental pulp stem cells in 3D scaffolds: A regenerative bone material.

Nury Tatiana Jiménez, Juan Carlos Munévar, José Manuel González, Clementina Infante, Sandra Janneth Perdomo Lara

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. 3D Culture of MSCs for Clinical Application.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nury Tatiana JiménezMaster in Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Juan Carlos MunévarUnit of Oral Basic Investigation, School of Dentistry, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.
José Manuel GonzálezMaster in Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Clementina InfanteMaster in Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia.
Sandra Janneth Perdomo LaraUnit of Oral Basic Investigation, School of Dentistry, Universidad El Bosque, Bogotá, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional-porous scaffolds of bone graft substitutes play a critical role in both cell targeting and transplantation strategies. These scaffolds provide surfaces that facilitate the response of stem cells related to attachment, survival, migration, proliferation, and differentiation.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to evaluate the

methodWe performed an

resultsThe differentiation capability of hDPSCs towards the osteoblast lineage was better in the scaffold of PLGA/HA at 7, 15 and 30 days, as indicated by the high expression of osteogenic markers

conclusionThe PLGA/HA scaffold provided better physical and chemical signals, as judged by the ability of dental pulp stem cells to adhere, proliferate and differentiate toward the osteogenic lineage.

Indexed as

Cell biologyDentistryMolecular biology

Identifiers

PMID30263971
PMCPMC6156910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.