Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30263915›Full record

ArticleData in brief2018

Distribution of evaluation scores for the models submitted to the second cryo-EM model challenge.

Andriy Kryshtafovych, Bohdan Monastyrskyy, Paul D Adams, Catherine L Lawson, Wah Chiu

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Data in brief, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Comparing cryo-EM structures.Journal of structural biology · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andriy KryshtafovychGenome Center, University of California, Davis, 451 Health Sciences Drive, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Bohdan MonastyrskyyGenome Center, University of California, Davis, 451 Health Sciences Drive, Davis, CA 95616, USA.
Paul D AdamsMolecular Biophysics & Integrated Bioimaging, LBNL, CA 94720, USA.
Catherine L LawsonInstitute for Quantitative Biomedicine and Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, 174 Frelinghuysen Road, Piscataway, NJ 08854, USA.
Wah ChiuDepartment of Bioengineering, Microbiology and Immunology and Photon Science, Stanford University, James H. Clark Center, MC5447, 318 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5447, USA.

Funding

PROJECT 5 - DUKE - STRUCTURE VALIDATION AND IMPROVEMENT FOR PROTEINS AND N. ACIDSP01GM063210 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIF-LAWRENC BERKELEY LAB · PI ADAMS, PAUL DAVID · 2001 to 2021
$33.5M
Unified Data Resource for Large Complexes Determined by Cryo-Electron MicroscopyR01GM079429 · NIGMS · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CHIU, WAH · 2007 to 2021
$11.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS P01 GM063210NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM079429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

142 protein structure models were submitted to second Cryo-EM model challenge (2015-2016). Accuracy of the models was evaluated with 54 evaluation scores. Results of the descriptive statistical analysis of the scores are provided in this article.

Identifiers

PMID30263915
PMCPMC6157618

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.