Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30263872›Full record

ArticleNature biomedical engineering2018

First-in-human study of the safety and viability of intraocular robotic surgery.

T L Edwards, K Xue, H C M Meenink, M J Beelen, G J L Naus, M P Simunovic, M Latasiewicz, A D Farmery, M D de Smet, R E MacLaren

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature biomedical engineering, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 95 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
95citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

95 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 209 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Hybrid Parallel-Serial Tool Exchange Robot for Ophthalmic Precision Surgery: Mechanical Design.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2026
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Cell therapy for age-related macular degeneration.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2026
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Development of Teleoperated Robotic System for Remote Intraocular Microsurgery.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  17. Control Modes of Teleoperated Surgical Robotic System's Tools in Ophthalmic Surgery.IEEE transactions on medical robotics and bionics · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Magnification-Invariant Retinal Distance Estimation for Vitreoretinal Surgery Using a Laser Aiming Beam.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

35 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

T L EdwardsNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
K XueNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
H C M MeeninkPreceyes BV, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
M J BeelenPreceyes BV, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
G J L NausPreceyes BV, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
M P SimunovicNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
M LatasiewiczOxford Eye Hospital, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
A D FarmeryNuffield Division of Anaesthetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
M D de SmetPreceyes BV, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
R E MacLarenNuffield Laboratory of Ophthalmology, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. enquiries@eye.ox.ac.uk.
University of Oxford · GBOxford University Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health II-C2-0713-20005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Microsurgery of the retina would be dramatically improved by instruments that offer supra-human precision. Here, we report the results of a first-in-human study of remotely controlled robot-assisted retinal surgery performed through a telemanipulation device. Specifically, 12 patients requiring dissection of the epiretinal or inner limiting membrane over the macula were randomly assigned to either undergo robot-assisted-surgery or manual surgery, under general anaesthesia. We evaluated surgical success, duration of surgery and amount of retinal microtrauma as a proxy for safety. Surgical outcomes were equally successful in the robotic-surgery and manual-surgery groups. Differences in the amount of retinal microtrauma between the two groups were statistically insignificant, yet dissection took longer with robotic surgery (median time, 4 min 5 s) than with manual surgery (1 min 20 s). We also show the feasibility of using the robot to inject recombinant tissue plasminogen activator under the retina to displace sight-threatening haemorrhage in three patients under local anaesthesia. A safe and viable robotic system for intraocular surgery would enable precise and minimally traumatic delivery of gene therapy or cell therapy to the retina.

Indexed as

intraocularretinaRoboticsurgerytelemanipulation

Identifiers

PMID30263872
PMCPMC6155489
OpenAlexW2808253872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.