ArticleFood science and biotechnology2018
Multiplex PCR assay and lyophilization for detection of
Article in Food science and biotechnology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Vacuum Oven Drying: A Cost-Effective Way of Producing Field-Deployable Reagents for In-house Real-Time PCR Methods.Molecular biotechnology · 2025Article
- Development and evaluation of a lyophilization protocol for colorimetric RT-LAMP diagnostic assay for COVID-19.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Development of a Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based DNA Lateral Flow Assay as a Point-of-Care Diagnostic for Fast and Simultaneous Detection of MRSA and Vancomycin Resistance in Bacteremia.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- A novel air-dried multiplex high-resolution melt assay for the detection of extended-spectrum β-lactamase and carbapenemase genes.Journal of global antimicrobial resistance · 2021Article
- Transferable, easy-to-use and room-temperature-storable PCR mixes for microfluidic molecular diagnostics.Talanta · 2021Article
- Review of Electrochemical DNA Biosensors for Detecting Food Borne Pathogens.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Multiplex PCR (m-PCR) has the potential for more rapid detection of pathogens compared to simple PCR through the simultaneous amplification of multiple gene targets using several sets of specific primers. Here, we developed an m-PCR assay which combined dry reagent mixtures for ready-to-use simultaneous detection of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.