ArticleFood science and biotechnology2017
Antifungal-demelanizing properties and RAW264.7 macrophages stimulation of glucan sulfate from the mycelium of the mushroom
Article in Food science and biotechnology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring the health benefits ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
- Review
- Article
- Multiple Fingerprint-Activity Relationship Assessment of Immunomodulatory Polysaccharides fromMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A narrative action on the battle against hunger using mushroom, peanut, and soybean-based wastes.Frontiers in public health · 2023Review
- Optimization of mycoremediation treatment for the chemical oxygen demand (COD) and ammonia nitrogen (AN) removal from domestic effluent using wild-Serbian Ganoderma lucidum (WSGL).Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Optimisation of biomass, exopolysaccharide and intracellular polysaccharide production from the mycelium of an identifiedAIMS microbiology · 2019Article
- Supercritical fluid extraction effectively removes phthalate plasticizers in spores ofFood science and biotechnology · 2018Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Underutilized mycelium of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.