Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30263285›Full record

ArticleFood science and biotechnology2016

Utilization of watermelon rind waste as a potential source of dietary fiber to improve health promoting properties and reduce glycemic index for cookie making.

Phisut Naknaen, Teerarat Itthisoponkul, Anchisa Sondee, Nutchanok Angsombat

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science and biotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Phisut NaknaenFaculty of Agricultural Product Innovation and Technology, Srinakharinwirot University, Sukhumvit 23, Bangkok, 10110 Thailand.
Teerarat ItthisoponkulFaculty of Agricultural Product Innovation and Technology, Srinakharinwirot University, Sukhumvit 23, Bangkok, 10110 Thailand.
Anchisa SondeeFaculty of Agricultural Product Innovation and Technology, Srinakharinwirot University, Sukhumvit 23, Bangkok, 10110 Thailand.
Nutchanok AngsombatFaculty of Agricultural Product Innovation and Technology, Srinakharinwirot University, Sukhumvit 23, Bangkok, 10110 Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Watermelon rind powder (WRP) is a rich source of dietary fiber and bioactive compounds, hence it could be used in the development of functional foods such as cookies. Different replacement levels of wheat flour with either WRP or hi-maize starch (HMS) (10-30%) on the quality of the cookies made were studied. The dietary fiber content in the cookies increased with incorporation of increasing level of either WRP or HMS. Increasing the proportion of the WRP in the cookie making resulted in an increase in the total phenolic content, 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical scavenging activity, and the ferric reducing antioxidant power. Using up to 20% of WRP and 30% of HMS in the cookie making promotes: increase in dietary fiber, decrease in predicted glycemic index to medium (for WRP) and low (for HMS) levels, and improving the antioxidant activity. These changes still produce an acceptable cookie.

Indexed as

antioxidant activitycookieglycemic indexhi-maize starchnon-enzymatic browningwatermelon rind powder

Identifiers

PMID30263285
PMCPMC6049186

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.