Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30263098›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2018

Predictive and prognostic role of peripheral blood eosinophil count in triple-negative and hormone receptor-negative/HER2-positive breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant treatment.

Concetta Elisa Onesti, Claire Josse, Aurélie Poncin, Pierre Frères, Christophe Poulet, Vincent Bours, Guy Jerusalem

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Eosinophilia in cancer and its regulation by sex hormones.Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Overexpression of MAL2 Correlates with Immune Infiltration and Poor Prognosis in Breast Cancer.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Concetta Elisa OnestiLaboratory of Human Genetics, GIGA Research Institute, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Claire JosseLaboratory of Human Genetics, GIGA Research Institute, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Aurélie PoncinLaboratory of Human Genetics, GIGA Research Institute, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Pierre FrèresLaboratory of Human Genetics, GIGA Research Institute, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Christophe PouletLaboratory of Human Genetics, GIGA Research Institute, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Vincent BoursLaboratory of Human Genetics, GIGA Research Institute, University of Liège, Liège, Belgium.
Guy JerusalemDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital (CHU Liège), Liège, Belgium.
University of Liège · BECentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Liège · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In current clinical practices, up to 27% of all breast cancer patients receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy. High pathological complete response rate is frequently associated with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes. Additionally, circulating immune cells are also often linked to chemotherapy response. We performed a retrospective analysis on a cohort of 112 breast cancer patients (79 triple-negative, 33 hormone receptor-negative/HER2-positive) treated with standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eosinophil and lymphocyte counts were collected from whole blood at baseline and during follow-ups and their associations with pathological complete response, relapse, disease-free and breast cancer-specific survival were analyzed. We observed a higher pathological complete response rate in patients who presented at baseline a relative eosinophil count ≥ 1.5% (55.6%) than in those with a relative eosinophil count < 1.5% (36.2%)(

Indexed as

eosinophilHER2-positive breast cancerneoadjuvant therapypathological complete responsetriple-negative breast cancer

Identifiers

PMID30263098
PMCPMC6154746
OpenAlexW2891610296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.