Evidence map›Paper›PMID 30263055›Full record

ReviewEcancermedicalscience2018

The implementation of omics technologies in cancer microbiome research.

Benjamin H Mullish, Laura S Osborne, Julian R Marchesi, Julie Ak McDonald

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ecancermedicalscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. The cancer microbiome.Advances in clinical chemistry · 2025
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Journal of investigative medicine : the official publication of the American Federation for Clinical Research · 2020
    Article
  7. Microbiome as an Immunological Modifier.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2020
    Article
  8. Oral microbiome and oral cancer - The probable nexus.Journal of oral and maxillofacial pathology : JOMFP
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Benjamin H MullishDivision of Integrative Systems Medicine and Digestive Disease, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Laura S OsborneMicrobiomes, Microbes and Informatics Research Department, School of Biosciences, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF10 3AT, UK.
Julian R MarchesiDivision of Integrative Systems Medicine and Digestive Disease, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.
Julie Ak McDonaldDivision of Integrative Systems Medicine and Digestive Disease, Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R000875/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Whilst the interplay between host genetics and the environment plays a pivotal role in the aetiopathogenesis of cancer, there are other key contributors of importance as well. One such factor of central and growing interest is the contribution of the microbiota to cancer. Even though the field is only a few years old, investigation of the 'cancer microbiome' has already led to major advances in knowledge of the basic biology of cancer risk and progression, opened novel avenues for biomarkers and diagnostics, and given a better understanding of mechanisms underlying response to therapy. Recent developments in microbial DNA sequencing techniques (and the bioinformatics required for analysis of these datasets) have allowed much more in-depth profiling of the structure of microbial communities than was previously possible. However, for more complete assessment of the functional implications of microbial changes, there is a growing recognition of the importance of the integration of microbial profiling with other omics modalities, with metabonomics (metabolite profiling) and proteomics (protein profiling) both gaining particular recent attention. In this review, we give an overview of some of the key scientific techniques being used to unravel the role of the cancer microbiome. We have aimed to highlight practical aspects related to sample collection and preparation, choice of the modality of analysis, and examples of where different omics technologies have been complementary to each other to highlight the significance of the cancer microbiome.

Indexed as

metabonomicsmetagenomicsmetaproteomicsmetataxonomicsmicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID30263055
PMCPMC6145519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.